Objective methods for assessing perceptual image quality traditionally attempted to quantify the visibility of errors (differences) between a distorted image and a reference image using a variety of known properties of the human visual system. Under the assumption that human visual perception is highly adapted for extracting structural information from a scene, we introduce an alternative complementary framework for quality assessment based on the degradation of structural information. As a specific example of this concept, we develop a structural similarity index and demonstrate its promise through a set of intuitive examples, as well as comparison to both subjective ratings and state-of-the-art objective methods on a database of images compressed with JPEG and JPEG2000. A MATLAB implementation of the proposed algorithm is available online at http://www.cns.nyu.edu//spl sim/lcv/ssim/.

/pdf/image-quality-assessment-from-error-visibility-to-structural-1rlwcqe34t.pdf

Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity

In this article, we have reviewed the reasons why we (collectively) want to love or leave the venerable (but perhaps hoary) MSE. We have also reviewed emerging alternative signal fidelity measures and discussed their potential application to a wide variety of problems. The message we are trying to send here is not that one should abandon use of the MSE nor to blindly switch to any other particular signal fidelity measure. Rather, we hope to make the point that there are powerful, easy-to-use, and easy-to-understand alternatives that might be deployed depending on the application environment and needs. While we expect (and indeed, hope) that the MSE will continue to be widely used as a signal fidelity measure, it is our greater desire to see more advanced signal fidelity measures being used, especially in applications where perceptual criteria might be relevant. Ideally, the performance of a new signal processing algorithm might be compared to other algorithms using several fidelity criteria. Lastly, we hope that we have given further motivation to the community to consider recent advanced signal fidelity measures as design criteria for optimizing signal processing algorithms and systems. It is in this direction that we believe that the greatest benefit eventually lies.

Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures

Single image haze removal is a challenging ill-posed problem. Existing methods use various constraints/priors to get plausible dehazing solutions. The key to achieve haze removal is to estimate a medium transmission map for an input hazy image. In this paper, we propose a trainable end-to-end system called DehazeNet, for medium transmission estimation. DehazeNet takes a hazy image as input, and outputs its medium transmission map that is subsequently used to recover a haze-free image via atmospheric scattering model. DehazeNet adopts convolutional neural network-based deep architecture, whose layers are specially designed to embody the established assumptions/priors in image dehazing. Specifically, the layers of Maxout units are used for feature extraction, which can generate almost all haze-relevant features. We also propose a novel nonlinear activation function in DehazeNet, called bilateral rectified linear unit, which is able to improve the quality of recovered haze-free image. We establish connections between the components of the proposed DehazeNet and those used in existing methods. Experiments on benchmark images show that DehazeNet achieves superior performance over existing methods, yet keeps efficient and easy to use.

/pdf/dehazenet-an-end-to-end-system-for-single-image-haze-removal-2xm00icsmx.pdf

DehazeNet: An End-to-End System for Single Image Haze Removal

Digital watermarking is a key ingredient to copyright protection. It provides a solution to illegal copying of digital material and has many other useful applications such as broadcast monitoring and the recording of electronic transactions. Now, for the first time, there is a book that focuses exclusively on this exciting technology. Digital Watermarking covers the crucial research findings in the field: it explains the principles underlying digital watermarking technologies, describes the requirements that have given rise to them, and discusses the diverse ends to which these technologies are being applied. As a result, additional groundwork is laid for future developments in this field, helping the reader understand and anticipate new approaches and applications.

Digital Watermarking

Preface 1 Introduction 1.1 Compression Techniques 1.1.1 Lossless Compression 1.1.2 Lossy Compression 1.1.3 Measures of Performance 1.2 Modeling and Coding 1.3 Organization of This Book 1.4 Summary 1.5 Projects and Problems 2 Mathematical Preliminaries 2.1 Overview 2.2 A Brief Introduction to Information Theory 2.3 Models 2.3.1 Physical Models 2.3.2 Probability Models 2.3.3. Markov Models 2.3.4 Summary 2.5 Projects and Problems 3 Huffman Coding 3.1 Overview 3.2 "Good" Codes 3.3. The Huffman Coding Algorithm 3.3.1 Minimum Variance Huffman Codes 3.3.2 Length of Huffman Codes 3.3.3 Extended Huffman Codes 3.4 Nonbinary Huffman Codes 3.5 Adaptive Huffman Coding 3.5.1 Update Procedure 3.5.2 Encoding Procedure 3.5.3 Decoding Procedure 3.6 Applications of Huffman Coding 3.6.1 Lossless Image Compression 3.6.2 Text Compression 3.6.3 Audio Compression 3.7 Summary 3.8 Projects and Problems 4 Arithmetic Coding 4.1 Overview 4.2 Introduction 4.3 Coding a Sequence 4.3.1 Generating a Tag 4.3.2 Deciphering the Tag 4.4 Generating a Binary Code 4.4.1 Uniqueness and Efficiency of the Arithmetic Code 4.4.2 Algorithm Implementation 4.4.3 Integer Implementation 4.5 Comparison of Huffman and Arithmetic Coding 4.6 Applications 4.6.1 Bi-Level Image Compression-The JBIG Standard 4.6.2 Image Compression 4.7 Summary 4.8 Projects and Problems 5 Dictionary Techniques 5.1 Overview 5.2 Introduction 5.3 Static Dictionary 5.3.1 Diagram Coding 5.4 Adaptive Dictionary 5.4.1 The LZ77 Approach 5.4.2 The LZ78 Approach 5.5 Applications 5.5.1 File Compression-UNIX COMPRESS 5.5.2 Image Compression-the Graphics Interchange Format (GIF) 5.5.3 Compression over Modems-V.42 bis 5.6 Summary 5.7 Projects and Problems 6 Lossless Image Compression 6.1 Overview 6.2 Introduction 6.3 Facsimile Encoding 6.3.1 Run-Length Coding 6.3.2 CCITT Group 3 and 4-Recommendations T.4 and T.6 6.3.3 Comparison of MH, MR, MMR, and JBIG 6.4 Progressive Image Transmission 6.5 Other Image Compression Approaches 6.5.1 Linear Prediction Models 6.5.2 Context Models 6.5.3 Multiresolution Models 6.5.4 Modeling Prediction Errors 6.6 Summary 6.7 Projects and Problems 7 Mathematical Preliminaries 7.1 Overview 7.2 Introduction 7.3 Distortion Criteria 7.3.1 The Human Visual System 7.3.2 Auditory Perception 7.4 Information Theory Revisted 7.4.1 Conditional Entropy 7.4.2 Average Mutual Information 7.4.3 Differential Entropy 7.5 Rate Distortion Theory 7.6 Models 7.6.1 Probability Models 7.6.2 Linear System Models 7.6.3 Physical Models 7.7 Summary 7.8 Projects and Problems 8 Scalar Quantization 8.1 Overview 8.2 Introduction 8.3 The Quantization Problem 8.4 Uniform Quantizer 8.5 Adaptive Quantization 8.5.1 Forward Adaptive Quantization 8.5.2 Backward Adaptive Quantization 8.6 Nonuniform Quantization 8.6.1 pdf-Optimized Quantization 8.6.2 Companded Quantization 8.7 Entropy-Coded Quantization 8.7.1 Entropy Coding of Lloyd-Max Quantizer Outputs 8.7.2 Entropy-Constrained Quantization 8.7.3 High-Rate Optimum Quantization 8.8 Summary 8.9 Projects and Problems 9 Vector Quantization 9.1 Overview 9.2 Introduction 9.3 Advantages of Vector Quantization over Scalar Quantization 9.4 The Linde-Buzo-Gray Algorithm 9.4.1 Initializing the LBG Algorithm 9.4.2 The Empty Cell Problem 9.4.3 Use of LBG for Image Compression 9.5 Tree-Structured Vector Quantizers 9.5.1 Design of Tree-Structured Vector Quantizers 9.6 Structured Vector Quantizers 9.6.1 Pyramid Vector Quantization 9.6.2 Polar and Spherical Vector Quantizers 9.6.3 Lattice Vector Quantizers 9.7 Variations on the Theme 9.7.1 Gain-Shape Vector Quantization 9.7.2 Mean-Removed Vector Quantization 9.7.3 Classified Vector Quantization 9.7.4 Multistage Vector Quantization 9.7.5 Adaptive Vector Quantization 9.8 Summary 9.9 Projects and Problems 10 Differential Encoding 10.1 Overview 10.2 Introduction 10.3 The Basic Algorithm 10.4 Prediction in DPCM 10.5 Adaptive DPCM (ADPCM) 10.5.1 Adaptive Quantization in DPCM 10.5.2 Adaptive Prediction in DPCM 10.6 Delta Modulation 10.6.1 Constant Factor Adaptive Delta Modulation (CFDM) 10.6.2 Continuously Variable Slope Delta Modulation 10.7 Speech Coding 10.7.1 G.726 10.8 Summary 10.9 Projects and Problems 11 Subband Coding 11.1 Overview 11.2 Introduction 11.3 The Frequency Domain and Filtering 11.3.1 Filters 11.4 The Basic Subband Coding Algorithm 11.4.1 Bit Allocation 11.5 Application to Speech Coding-G.722 11.6 Application to Audio Coding-MPEG Audio 11.7 Application to Image Compression 11.7.1 Decomposing an Image 11.7.2 Coding the Subbands 11.8 Wavelets 11.8.1 Families of Wavelets 11.8.2 Wavelets and Image Compression 11.9 Summary 11.10 Projects and Problems 12 Transform Coding 12.1 Overview 12.2 Introduction 12.3 The Transform 12.4 Transforms of Interest 12.4.1 Karhunen-Loeve Transform 12.4.2 Discrete Cosine Transform 12.4.3 Discrete Sine Transform 12.4.4 Discrete Walsh-Hadamard Transform 12.5 Quantization and Coding of Transform Coefficients 12.6 Application to Image Compression-JPEG 12.6.1 The Transform 12.6.2 Quantization 12.6.3 Coding 12.7 Application to Audio Compression 12.8 Summary 12.9 Projects and Problems 13 Analysis/Synthesis Schemes 13.1 Overview 13.2 Introduction 13.3 Speech Compression 13.3.1 The Channel Vocoder 13.3.2 The Linear Predictive Coder (Gov.Std.LPC-10) 13.3.3 Code Excited Linear Prediction (CELP) 13.3.4 Sinusoidal Coders 13.4 Image Compression 13.4.1 Fractal Compression 13.5 Summary 13.6 Projects and Problems 14 Video Compression 14.1 Overview 14.2 Introduction 14.3 Motion Compensation 14.4 Video Signal Representation 14.5 Algorithms for Videoconferencing and Videophones 14.5.1 ITU_T Recommendation H.261 14.5.2 Model-Based Coding 14.6 Asymmetric Applications 14.6.1 The MPEG Video Standard 14.7 Packet Video 14.7.1 ATM Networks 14.7.2 Compression Issues in ATM Networks 14.7.3 Compression Algorithms for Packet Video 14.8 Summary 14.9 Projects and Problems A Probability and Random Processes A.1 Probability A.2 Random Variables A.3 Distribution Functions A.4 Expectation A.5 Types of Distribution A.6 Stochastic Process A.7 Projects and Problems B A Brief Review of Matrix Concepts B.1 A Matrix B.2 Matrix Operations C Codes for Facsimile Encoding D The Root Lattices Bibliography Index

Introduction to data compression

Shannon's rate-distortion function provides a potentially useful lower bound against which to compare the rate-versus-distortion performance of practical encoding-transmission systems. However, this bound is not applicable unless one can arrive at a numerically-valued measure of distortion which is in reasonable correspondence with the subjective evaluation of the observer or interpreter. We have attempted to investigate this choice of distortion measure for monochrome still images. This investigation has considered a class of distortion measures for which it is possible to simulate the optimum (in a rate-distortion sense) encoding. Such simulation was performed at a fixed rate for various measures in the class and the results compared subjectively by observers. For several choices of transmission rate and original images, one distortion measure was fairly consistently rated as yielding the most satisfactory appearing encoded images.

The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

J. Mannos

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images