J. Hámori
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
38 Papers
572 Citations
J. Hámori is an academic researcher from Hungarian Academy of Sciences. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cerebellum & Cerebellar cortex. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 38 publications. Previous affiliations of J. Hámori include Pázmány Péter Catholic University & Eötvös Loránd University.
Chat about Author
Papers
Immunohistochemical visualization of a metabotropic glutamate receptor.
TL;DR: It is suggested that the selective postsynaptic localization of this receptor at the dendritic spines of Purkinje cells serves as the morphological basis for long term depression processes in the molecular layer of the cerebellar cortex.
128
Cellular and subcellular localization of the mGluR5a metabotropic glutamate receptor in rat spinal cord.
Zoltán Vidnyánszky,J. Hámori,László Négyessy,Doris Rüegg,Thomas Knöpfel,Rainer Kuhn,Tamás J. Görcs +6 more
TL;DR: Immunometal labelling revealed that mGluR5a-ir is concentrated at the periphery of postsynaptic densities of asymmetrical synapses or localized extrasynaptically at dendritic, and somatic membranes, which provides evidence for mGL5a being involved in the nociceptive transmission at the dorsal horn.
102
The use of CNN models in the subcortical visual pathway
Tamás Roska,J. Hámori,E. Labos,K. Lotz,László Orzó,J. Takács,P.L. Venetianer,Zoltán Vidnyánszky,Ákos Zarándy +8 more
TL;DR: The equivalent notions of neuroanatomy and the cellular neural network (CNN) model are discussed with a view toward studying the visual system and known effects are translated into CNN models to provide a framework for further studies.
81
Metabotrop glutamate receptor type 1a expressing unipolar brush cells in the cerebellar cortex of different species: a comparative quantitative study.
TL;DR: The quantitative morphology and distribution of UBCs in the 10 lobules of the vermis was studied using monoclonal mGluR1a antibody as a marker to visualise these recently described nerve cells and the functional significance of the differences in the density and in the distribution pattern is discussed.
49