Irène Supper
Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
19 Papers
62 Citations
Irène Supper is an academic researcher from Claude Bernard University Lyon 1. The author has contributed to research in topics: Randomized controlled trial & Type 2 diabetes. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 15 publications. Previous affiliations of Irène Supper include University of Lyon.
Chat about Author
Papers
Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: a review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors
TL;DR: The principal facilitator of interprofessional collaboration in primary care was the different actors' common interest in collaboration, perceiving opportunities to improve quality of care and to develop new professional fields.
Coopération entre médecins généralistes et pharmaciens : une revue systématique de la littérature
Pauline Michot,Olivier Catala,Irène Supper,Roselyne Boulieu,Yves Zerbib,Cyrille Colin,Laurent Letrilliart +6 more
TL;DR: In this article, a revue systematique de la litterature internationale (Litterature Internationale) realizede, a partir des banques de donnees Medline, Cochrane et Pascal.
35
•Journal Article
Cooperation between Physicians and Pharmacists: A Literature Review
Pauline Michot,Olivier Catala,Irène Supper,Roselyne Boulieu,Yves Zerbib,Cyrille Colin,Laurent Letrilliart +6 more
TL;DR: In this article, a systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database and the PASCAL database to assess the effectiveness of interventions based on cooperation between general practitioners and pharmacists.
12
Are concomitant treatments confounding factors in randomized controlled trials on intensive blood-glucose control in type 2 diabetes? a systematic review
Rémy Boussageon,Irène Supper,Sylvie Erpeldinger,Michel Cucherat,Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant,Behrouz Kassai,Behrouz Kassai,Catherine Cornu,Catherine Cornu,François Gueyffier +9 more
TL;DR: Few concomitant treatments were published in this sample of open-label RCTs on type 2 diabetes because of observer bias, and this bias probably influenced the results to an extent that has yet to be determined.