Henry van der Wiel
Economic Policy Institute
32 Papers
279 Citations
Henry van der Wiel is an academic researcher from Economic Policy Institute. The author has contributed to research in topics: Productivity & Competition (economics). The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 32 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
ICT, Innovation and Business Performance in Services: Evidence for Germany and the Netherlands
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed the importance of ICT capital deepening and innovation for productivity in German and Dutch firms from the services sector and found that ICT use and innovation may be complementary.
83
•Posted Content
How (Not) to Measure Competition
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduce a new measure of competition: the elasticity of a firm's profits with respect to its cost level, which signals more intense competi- tion, and compare PE with the most popular competition measures such as the price cost margin (PCM).
80
•Posted Content
ICT, Innovation and Business Performance in Services: Evidence for Germany and the Netherlands
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed the importance of ICT capital deepening and innovation for productivity in German and Dutch firms from the services sector and found that ICT use and innovation may be complementary.
72
•Posted Content
Does ICT boost Dutch productivity growth
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed whether ICT has recently boosted Dutch labour productivity growth, similar to developments in the US, in the second half of the 1990s, and found that the productivity performance of the Dutch ICT sector accounts for a large share in the rebound of labour productivity.
•Posted Content
Competition in the Netherlands; an analysis of the period 1993-2001
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the impact of regulatory reforms on competition in the Dutch market sector and found that regulatory reforms could have intensified competition, however, strong growth of market demand has weakened competition and it counterbalanced to some extent the impact on regulatory reforms.
33