The rate and pattern of change in depressive symptoms among male primary alcoholics (no preexisting major psychiatric disorder) were studied throughout inpatient treatment for alcoholism. A sample of 191 alcoholics was interviewed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale within 48 hours of admission and again at each of the 4 weeks of treatment. Results indicate that 42% of alcoholics have clinically significant levels of depression (Hamilton greater than or equal to 20) at intake but only 6% remain clinically depressed at Week 4. Depressive symptoms of alcoholics abate quickly with the largest reduction in scores at Week 2. Mood related symptoms constitute the largest portion of presenting depression and abate most rapidly. Vegetative symptoms remain the most prevalent type of depressive symptom at discharge. Results suggest that antidepressant medication should not be considered prior to 4 weeks of abstinence.

Changes in depression among abstinent alcoholics.

Serotonergic Responsivity and Behavioral Dimensions in Antisocial Personality Disorder with Substance Abuse

Individual differences in the reinforcing and subjective effects of amphetamine and diazepam

Behavioral pharmacologists have assumed that the properties of drugs that mediate their discriminative stimulus effects are related to aspects of drug actions that result in their subjective effects in humans. The basis of this assumption is examined in this chapter. Evidence to support this assumption includes the formal properties of the learning process involved in acquiring both behaviors. Although the procedures used to train animals to learn a drug discrimination are explicit, an analysis of how humans learn to attach verbal responses to unobservable internal subjective states appears to involve a similar learning paradigm. Additional evidence of the commonality of the two effects is that the results from drug discrimination studies in animals and studies evaluating subjective effects in humans yield similar drug classifications. However, when subjective drug effects are analyzed in more detail, it is clear that the concordance between the two approaches is not always good. On the other hand, when drug discrimination and subjective effects are both measured in humans, an examination of the results generated when individuals respond differently to the same drug indicates that the hypothesis that their discrimination is based upon a profile of subjective effects is supported.

Relationship between the discriminative stimulus properties and subjective effects of drugs.

Using a neuroendocrine probe we studied nine male offenders in a forensic hospital, convicted of murder, with a diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder, who had been behaviourally 'quiescent' for varying periods and who had not recently been abusing drugs. Nine healthy age-matched men also participated. All subjects received 30 mg d-fenfluramine (d-FEN), a 5-HT releasing agent, orally, after an overnight fast, and serial samples for prolactin estimation were taken hourly for five hours. Responses were significantly impaired in the patients, suggesting a subsensitivity of certain 5-HT systems in antisocial personality disorder, regardless of recent or ongoing behavioural disturbance.

Blunted prolactin responses to d-fenfluramine in sociopathy. Evidence for subsensitivity of central serotonergic function.

Opiate addicts (n = 67) were asked how much they liked their first experience with 10 drugs and the number of trials required to like each drug The initial experience with cocaine was the most well-liked but it could not be differentiated from heroin which was liked second best The order of liking scores for the other drugs were morphine, marijuana, methadone, Benzedrine, codeine, cigarettes, “goofballs” (barbiturates), and alcohol Liking of heroin was not differentiated from morphine or marijuana but liking for it was greater than for the seven remaining drugs Initial liking of heroin and marijuana is contrary to the conclusions of Beecher (1959) and Becker (1953) The pattern of liking of the first experience with drugs was highly related to the patterns for current appetites and verbal habits for drugs and somewhat related to the days of use of drugs and the percentage of subjects who had been “hooked” on the drugs The scores for heroin on the various indices were the most uniformly elevated In c

Liking of the first drug experience: a comparison of ten drugs in opiate addicts.

Defeated and Joyless scales were developed from a questionnaire given to 54 normal, 53 alcoholic, and 28 opiate addict subjects. The Defeated scale differentiates the alcoholics and addicts from normals but not from each other, whereas the Joyless scale differentiates addicts from both alcoholics and normals. When shown to 48 college students, a film about poverty increased the Joyless score, as well as other measures, but had little effect on the Defeated score. These scales appear to distinguish between self-concept (Defeated) and mood (Joyless) components of hypophoria, an affective disorder hypothesized to be associated with drug abuse.

Defeated and joyless: potential measures of change in drug abuse characteristics.

Effects of clean, drug relevant, and drug word stimuli upon verbal associations to stages of addiction and steps in drug-taking.

Evidence for a general social deviancy subcultural factor was found using the Kulik, Sarbin, and Stein (1971) slang test on drugs, gangs, law enforcement, and general words. The slang scores of 68 confirmed opiate addicts exceeded those of normals and young delinquents reported by Kulik, et al. (1971), including delinquents who were recidivists. Addicts knew more drug and alcohol slang than slang in the three other categories. It was recommended that more attempts should be made to subdivide measures of social deviancy by means of slang as there is some evidence of possible further differentiation of subcultural types by means of slang.

Slang knowledge as an indicator of a general social deviancy subcultural factor

Estimating specificity of drug and alcohol subcultural groups with slang names for drugs.

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Frances E. Ross

Author Tools

Chat about Author