Eric Arazo
Dublin City University
23 Papers
6 Citations
Eric Arazo is an academic researcher from Dublin City University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Convolutional neural network. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 15 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learning
Eric Arazo,Diego Ortego,Paul Albert,Noel E. O'Connor,Kevin McGuinness +4 more
- 19 Jul 2020
TL;DR: FjQsC as discussed by the authors proposes to learn from unlabeled data by generating soft pseudo-labels using the network predictions, which achieves state-of-the-art results in CIFAR-10/100, SVHN, and Mini-ImageNet despite being much simpler than other methods.
•Posted Content
Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learning
TL;DR: This work shows that a naive pseudo-labeling overfits to incorrect pseudo-labels due to the so-called confirmation bias and demonstrates that mixup augmentation and setting a minimum number of labeled samples per mini-batch are effective regularization techniques for reducing it.
•Proceedings Article
Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correction
Eric Arazo,Diego Ortego,Paul Albert,Noel E. O'Connor,Kevin McGuinness +4 more
- 25 Apr 2019
TL;DR: A suitable two-component mixture model is suggested as an unsupervised generative model of sample loss values during training to allow online estimation of the probability that a sample is mislabelled and correct the loss by relying on the network prediction.
•Posted Content
Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correction
TL;DR: In this paper, a two-component mixture model is proposed as an unsupervised generative model of sample loss values during training to allow online estimation of the probability that a sample is mislabelled.
229
•Posted Content
Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noise
TL;DR: A novel label noise detection method that exploits the robust feature representations learned via contrastive learning to estimate per-sample soft-labels whose disagreements with the original labels accurately identify noisy samples.
92