Ellen M. Markman
Stanford University
98 Papers
1.1K Citations
Ellen M. Markman is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Verbal learning & Object (philosophy). The author has an hindex of 49, co-authored 96 publications. Previous affiliations of Ellen M. Markman include University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
Chat about Author
Papers
Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words ☆
Ellen M. Markman,Gwyn F Wachtel +1 more
TL;DR: Mutual exclusivity motivates children to learn terms for attributes, substances, and parts as well as for objects themselves.
1.2K
Categories and induction in young children
Susan A. Gelman,Ellen M. Markman +1 more
TL;DR: The present work addresses how expectations about natural kinds originate by examining how young children, with their usual reliance on perceptual appearances and only rudimentary scientific knowledge, might not induce new information within natural kind categories.
1.1K
•Book
Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction
Ellen M. Markman
- 01 Jan 1989
TL;DR: Ellen Markman challenges the fundamental assumptions of traditional theories of language acquisition and proposes that a set of constraints or principles of induction allows children to efficiently integrate knowledge and to induce information about new examples of familiar categories.
1.1K
Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: taxonomic versus thematic relations
TL;DR: This paper showed that children limit the possible meanings of nouns to refer mainly to categorical relations, and that this constraint greatly simplifies the problem of language learning by limiting the hypotheses that children need to consider.
679
Realizing that you don't understand: elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies.
TL;DR: This paper investigated elementary school children's awareness of their own comprehension failure when presented with inconsistent information, and found that children were more likely to notice explicit than implicit contradictions, and even 12-year-olds judged as comprehensible a sizable proportion of essays with seemingly obvious inconsistencies.
559