Douglas L. Dean
Brigham Young University
62 Papers
861 Citations
Douglas L. Dean is an academic researcher from Brigham Young University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Collaborative software & Computer science. The author has an hindex of 22, co-authored 62 publications. Previous affiliations of Douglas L. Dean include University of Arizona.
Chat about Author
Papers
Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course
TL;DR: The results of this study support the conclusion that a technology enhanced flipped classroom was both effective and scalable; it better facilitated learning than the simulation-based training and students found this approach to be more motivating in that it allowed for greater differentiation of instruction.
1.1K
Identifying Quality, Novel, and Creative Ideas: Constructs and Scales for Idea Evaluation
TL;DR: A method for evaluating ideas with regard to four dimensions—novelty, workability, relevance, and specificity—and has identified two measurable sub-dimensions for each of the four main dimensions is described.
•Proceedings Article
Defining key concepts for collaboration Engineering
Robert O. Briggs,Robert O. Briggs,Gert-Jan de Vreede,Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten,Douglas L. Dean +4 more
- 01 Dec 2006
TL;DR: To establish common language among CE researchers in, and to focus the research efforts in this domain, the current definitions of key concepts in the CE domain are documents.
207
Marketplace and technology standards for B2B e-commerce: progress, challenges, and the state of the art
TL;DR: There is an unfilled need for systems that can reliably locate buyers and sellers in electronic marketplaces and also facilitate automated transactions in e-commerce architectures, based on an analysis of mainline EC architectures.
149
Profiling the research productivity of tenured information systems faculty at U.S. Institutions
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the effect of acknowledging different sets of journals as highly rated on the publication rates of faculty who earned tenure, and presented journal publication benchmarks based on these findings for different types of research institutions.
101