Dmitry Gavinsky
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
6 Papers
62 Citations
Dmitry Gavinsky is an academic researcher from Technion – Israel Institute of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: BrownBoost & Boosting (machine learning). The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 6 publications. Previous affiliations of Dmitry Gavinsky include University of Calgary.
Chat about Author
Papers
Optimally-smooth adaptive boosting and application to agnostic learning
TL;DR: A new boosting algorithm is described that is the first such algorithm to be both smooth and adaptive, and the construction of a boosting "tandem" whose asymptotic number of iterations is the lowest possible and whose smoothness is optimal in terms of O(·).
Optimally-Smooth Adaptive Boosting and Application to Agnostic Learning
Dmitry Gavinsky
- 24 Nov 2002
TL;DR: A boosting algorithm is constructed, which is the first both smooth and adaptive booster, and eventually a boosting "tandem", which allows solving adaptively problems whose solution is based on smooth boosting, preserving the original solution's complexity.
27
•Journal Article
Optimally-smooth adaptive boosting and application to agnostic learning
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors derived a lower bound for the final error achievable by boosting in the agnostic model, and showed that the algorithm can achieve an exponential improvement w.r.t.
14
On Boosting with Optimal Poly-Bounded Distributions
Nader H. Bshouty,Dmitry Gavinsky +1 more
- 16 Jul 2001
TL;DR: A framework is constructed which allows to bound polynomially the distributions produced by certain boosting algorithms, without significant performance loss, and turns AdaBoost into an on-line boosting algorithm (boosting "by filtering"), which can be applied to the wider range of learning problems.
10
and other Equivalent Models in Learning
Dmitry Gavinsky,Nader H. Bshouty +1 more
- 01 Jan 2002
TL;DR: The Probably Almost Exact model (PAExact) [BJTO2] can be viewed as the Exacts model relaxed so that the counterexamples to equivalence queries are distributionally drawn rather than adversarially chosen.