David Kennett
University of Liverpool
9 Papers
89 Citations
David Kennett is an academic researcher from University of Liverpool. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computational fluid dynamics & Stencil. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 9 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
An implicit meshless method for application in computational fluid dynamics
TL;DR: In this article, an implicit meshless scheme is developed for solving the Euler equations, as well as the laminar and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations.
41
Semi-meshless stencil selection for anisotropic point distributions
TL;DR: In this paper, a fully automatic method of selecting the stencils from anisotropic point distributions, which are obtained from overlapping structured grids, is outlined The original connectivity and the concept of a resolving direction are used to help construct good quality stencil with limited user input.
15
Numerical simulation of control surface deflections over a generic UCAV configuration at off-design flow conditions
David Kennett,George Hoholis,Ken Badcock +2 more
- 01 Jan 2014
TL;DR: In this paper, the ability of computational fluid dynamics to predict the steady and unsteady fluid flow over a generic UCAV configuration, with and without control surface deflections, at off design conditions is investigated.
14
Prediction of Control Effectiveness for a Highly Swept Unmanned Air Vehicle Configuration
TL;DR: In this paper, a study into the prediction of the effectiveness of different trailing edge controls on an unmanned combat aerial vehicle configuration, on which complex vortical flow develops at moderate to high angles of attack, is described Stability and control of these vehicles is demanding and requires early knowledge of the changes in forces and moments from control-surface deflections.
11
Assessment of tabular models using CFD
A.J. McCracken,David Kennett,Ken Badcock,A. Da Ronch +3 more
- 21 Aug 2013
TL;DR: In this paper, the limitations of the tabular model are assessed through a comparison of loads or trajectories against a time-accurate computational fluid dynamics solution for both forced and free-response manoeuvres.