Danielle Every
Central Queensland University
44 Papers
91 Citations
Danielle Every is an academic researcher from Central Queensland University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Refugee & Racism. The author has an hindex of 18, co-authored 44 publications. Previous affiliations of Danielle Every include University of South Australia & University of Adelaide.
Chat about Author
Papers
The Language of “Race” and Prejudice A Discourse of Denial, Reason, and Liberal-Practical Politics
TL;DR: This paper reviewed these discursive patterns or ways of talking about the other and emphasises the significant contribution that this work has made to research on language and discrimination, and demonstrated the flexible and ambivalent nature of contemporary race discourse.
New racism, meritocracy and individualism: constraining affirmative action in education:
TL;DR: This article presented a discursive analysis of student talk on disadvantage and affirmative action from two focus group discussions on race relations in Australia, and built upon the prior work of This article...
244
Constructions of Australia in pro- and anti-asylum seeker political discourse
TL;DR: The authors compare the ways in which "Australia" is constructed and used in parliamentary speeches on asylum seekers by both refugee advocates and those seeking harsher asylum seeker laws in Australia and highlight the flexibility of nationalist discourse, in that the same constructions of the nation may be used for both exclusive and inclusive purposes.
98
Taking advantage' or fleeing persecution? Opposing accounts of asylum seeking
TL;DR: The authors examined advocates' explanations of asylum seeking in the 2001 Australian parliamentary debates and examined three influences shaping advocates' arguments: opposing anti-asylum seeker rhetoric, theories of the formation of anti-Asylum seeker public opinion, and the parliamentary and wider liberal democratic intellectual political framework.
71
A Reasonable, Practical and Moderate Humanitarianism: The Co-option of Humanitarianism in the Australian Asylum Seeker Debates
TL;DR: The authors explores how these binaries framed Australian political debates over asylum seeking, providing persuasive discursive resources for limiting humanitarian responsibilities for asylum seekers, and demonstrates that the consideration of "costs to self" is so flexible that these costs can be presented in such a way as to deny any humanitarian responsibility whatsoever.
65