Daniel Leiker
4 Papers
Daniel Leiker is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Globe. The author has co-authored 1 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
Generative AI for Learning: Investigating the Potential of Learning Videos with Synthetic Virtual Instructors
Daniel Leiker,Mutlu Cukurova +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors examined the impact of using generative artificial intelligence to create learning videos with synthetic virtual instructors and found that learners in both conditions demonstrated significant improvement from pre-to post-learning.
28
Prototyping the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for adult learning content creation at scale
Daniel Leiker,Mutlu Cukurova +1 more
TL;DR: In this article , the authors investigate the use of large language models in asynchronous course creation, particularly within the context of adult learning, training and upskilling, and develop a course prototype leveraging an LLM, implementing a robust human-in-the-loop process to ensure the accuracy and clarity of the generated content.
•Posted Content
Widening Access to Applied Machine Learning with TinyML.
Vijay Janapa Reddi,Brian Plancher,Susan Kennedy,Laurence Moroney,Pete Warden,Anant Agarwal,Colby R. Banbury,Massimo Banzi,Matthew Bennett,Benjamin Brown,Sharad Chitlangia,Radhika Ghosal,Sarah Grafman,Rupert Jaeger,Srivatsan Krishnan,Maximilian Lam,Daniel Leiker,Cara Mann,Mark Mazumder,Dominic Pajak,Dhilan Ramaprasad,J. Evan Smith,Matthew Stewart,Dustin Tingley +23 more
TL;DR: TinyML as mentioned in this paper is a massive open online course (MOOC) on Tiny Machine Learning (TML), which encourages the development of complete, self-contained applications, from data collection to deployment.
Generative AI for learning: Investigating the potential of synthetic learning videos
Daniel Leiker,Mutlu Cukurova +1 more
TL;DR: In this article , the authors explored the utility of using AI-generated synthetic video to create viable educational content for online educational settings, and found that learners in both conditions demonstrated significant improvement from pre-to post-learning (p<.001), with no significant differences in gains between the two conditions (p=.80).