Positive parent-professional collaboration is critical for the educational success of students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, little is known about teacher perceptions of parent-professional collaboration. Thirty-four teachers participated in a qualitative study to gain a better understanding of teachers’ perceptions of helpful parental involvement and advocacy strategies to ensure the success of students with ASD educated in inclusive settings. Through focus groups and interviews, teachers reported perceptions of parents ranging from too much involvement to not enough involvement, the importance of parental and student advocacy, and shared examples of positive parental advocacy. Implications for practice and directions for future research are discussed. As children and youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are increasingly participating in inclusive education settings, the need for parent and professional collaboration is essential for students’ success. The foundation of support for students is ongoing communication and collaboration between parents and teachers. Positive parent-teacher collaboration benefits the family, educators, and students with disabilities (Bezdak, Summers, & Turnbull, 2010; Turnbull, Zuna, Turnbull, Poston, & Summers, 2007). In fact, research indicates parental involvement in schools is strongly linked to better student outcomes related to academics and involvement in organized groups and friendships (Newman, 2004). Moreover, federal mandates support parent involvement in developing, reviewing, and revising the child’s individualized education program (IEP; Turnbull et al., 2007) and value parents as equal partners and informed decision makers in their child’s education (e.g., the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 2004, and the No Child Left Behind Act, 2002). Research suggests that in the case of social skills of students with ASD, certain skills may be context-specific making it necessary for parents and professionals to be involved in order to fully understand the student’s abilities (Murray, Ruble, Willis, & Molloy, 2009). Even though such partnerships are widely valued, establishing positive parent-teacher partnerships can be difficult (Epstein, 2005). Research has found conflicting results in regards to parents’ perceptions of parentteacher partnerships. For example, in a survey of parents of children with ASD, parents reported they felt resentment from school personnel and other parents (Starr & Foy, 2010). Parents felt this resentment was often the result of the time and resources their child required from teachers. Further, many parents reported lack of communication and collaboration as a significant problem. On the other hand, strong communication and collaboration were reported by some parents as primary reasons for their satisfaction with their child’s educational experience (Rodriquez et al., 2014). Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Tia R. Schultz, Department of Special Education, 5045 Winther Hall, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, Whitewater, WI 53190. E-mail: schulttr@uww.edu Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 2016, 51(4), 344–354 © Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities 344 / Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities-December 2016 Parents who were most satisfied with their child’s educational services had children in younger grades (kindergarten to third grade), possibly indicating greater collaboration in early elementary school years compared to secondary school years. Similarly, parents of children with ASD in a study conducted by Stoner et al. (2005) echoed the need for frequent and open communication among teachers and parents. These parents further noted that negative communication and collaboration experiences resulted in a lack of trust of the educational professionals, which was difficult to regain. Parents reported feeling supported when they believed educators were knowledgeable about ASD, able to manage behaviors, and engaged in quality collaboration and communication with them (Starr & Foy, 2012). The diagnostic process is a crucial time for potential collaboration. Unfortunately, parents have reported frustration due to their concerns not being heard, and needing to “fight” to be heard in order to begin the diagnostic process (Braiden, Bothwell, & Duffy, 2010). Once the process begins some parents report feeling confused about the roles of the team members and what evaluations are done (Braiden et al., 2010). When a diagnosis is received, some parents report they were not given the information they needed about understanding ASD or the available services for their child (Osborne & Reed, 2008). Parents often feel they have to search for information instead of having it provided by the professionals working with their child (Brown, Ouellette-Kuntz, Hunter, Kelley, & Cobigo, 2012; Glazard & Overall, 2012). Another important time for collaboration is during the IEP process. While IEP meetings provide an opportunity for parents and educators to collaborate, research suggests families who participate in traditional IEP meetings have expressed their primary roles included listening and answering questions (Childre & Chambers, 2005). When Childre and Chambers (2005) interviewed families about their experiences with traditional IEP meetings, families reported minimal collaboration with the school staff and feeling pressured to agree with preset agendas including student goals and educational placements (Childre & Chambers, 2005). Further, in a study of parent perceptions of IEP meetings, parents reported inconsistency between their views and teachers’ views regarding what practices should be implemented for their children and what services should be provided (Fish, 2006). Parents additionally reported they felt blamed for their child’s academic and behavioral difficulties and expressed concern that teachers were unaware of the student’s services and accommodations listed in the IEP. Parents voiced a desire for the IEP meeting to be more collaborative in nature so they could be equal contributors (Fish, 2006). Unfortunately, research indicates education professionals often do not view parents as equal partners. For example, Bezdek and colleagues (2010) interviewed educational professionals regarding their perceptions of partnerships with parents of children with disabilities and results indicated they wanted parents to be involved but only to a limited extent. In other words, education professionals desired families who supported their guidance about how to work with the child with disabilities, but did not value families who provided too much input on the supports they felt their child needed. While some of the professionals placed blame on families who did not follow through with suggested supports at home, others recognized that not all parents have the necessary time, knowledge, or skills to facilitate supports at home (Bezdek et al., 2010). Parents have noted strong parental involvement often depends on individual teachers, not the school system as a whole (Barclift, 2010), highlighting the importance of individual teachers in starting and sustaining collaboration with parents. Parent-teacher collaboration can often be hindered by unfamiliar language during the IEP process, as many educators use educational jargon parents are unfamiliar with (Barclift, 2010), and language and cultural differences between the family and school personnel (Lo, 2009). Parent-teacher collaboration and parental advocacy are integral to one another. Parents who have children with ASD have been noted in the literature as being strong advocates for their children. For example, Barclift (2010) interviewed 15 parents of children with ASD and provided examples of successful parental advocacy, including one participant who requested monthly meetings with the IEP team Parent-Teacher Collaboration / 345 because she felt the yearly IEP meeting did not provide sufficient information to keep her fully informed. Another parent noted “she felt she was the only voice her child had” (Barclift, 2010, p. 66). Parents need educators who are not only knowledgeable about their child’s disability and evidence based interventions, but who will collaborate and advocate with them in order to best support their child. Planned parent-professional partnerships within the school setting are necessary for increased parental involvement and advocacy (Epstein & Jansorn, 2004). School personnel need to encourage and guide parents on how to become involved in their child’s education (Epstein & Jansorn, 2004). In fact, research has demonstrated that parent involvement is strongly correlated with teacher invitations (Anderson & Minke, 2007). Moreover, communication between home and school predicted positive parent-teacher relationships (Minke, Sheridan, Kim, Ryoo, & Koziol, 2014). However, limited information is available regarding teachers’ perceptions of parents of children with ASD and their views on parentteacher collaboration. More information is needed about teachers’ perceptions of parents and how their beliefs impact parent-teacher partnerships. Research supports the notion that collaborative parentteacher relationships can enhance the positive social and academic outcomes for children and youth with ASD (Turnbull et al., 2007). However, more information is needed to help understand and confront the barriers of parent-professional collaboration to promote positive outcomes for children and youth with ASD in our schools. Thus, the focus of this study was to gain an understanding of teachers’ perceptions of helpful parental involvement and advocacy strategies for ensuring students’ with ASD success in inclusive school settings.

https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/vm40xx31r

Parent-Teacher Collaboration: Teacher Perceptions of What Is Needed to Support Students with ASD in the Inclusive Classroom.

https://repository.asu.edu/attachments/56579/content/Fox_asu_0010E_10607.pdf

Expectations and the Post Transition of Young Adults with an Autism Spectrum Disorder to Post-Secondary Education

of a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy

Interpretations of student engagement in the context of the Orff Schulwerk music classroom at the Dubard School for Language Disorders

This qualitative research study investigates the challenges of parent-teacher collaboration in the education of deaf students across nine divisions of Punjab. With an aim to enhance the educational experience of deaf students, we conducted interviews with 30 parents and 30 teachers to gain insights into their experiences, perspectives and the dynamics of collaboration. Thematic analysis was employed to identify recurring themes and patterns in the data. The findings revealed noteworthy disparities in the viewpoints of parents and teachers. Parents often grapple with feelings of undervaluation, language barriers, and unrealistic expectations, while teachers report varying parental commitment, irregular attendance, and communication challenges. So, it is recommended that school administrations should proactively create a welcoming and inclusive environment that encourages parent-teacher partnerships by initiating regular open houses, parent involvement committees, cultural events between home and school, create online groups for interaction and sharing concerns. 

Challenges of Parent-Teacher Collaboration in the Education of Deaf Students

Parental Advocacy for Students with Autism.

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Coriann Barclift

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Parental Advocacy for Students with Autism.