Chemistries that Facilitate Nanotechnology Kim E. Sapsford,† W. Russ Algar, Lorenzo Berti, Kelly Boeneman Gemmill,‡ Brendan J. Casey,† Eunkeu Oh, Michael H. Stewart, and Igor L. Medintz*,‡ †Division of Biology, Department of Chemistry and Materials Science, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States ‡Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering Code 6900 and Division of Optical Sciences Code 5611, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375, United States College of Science, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, United States Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, California 95817, United States Sotera Defense Solutions, Crofton, Maryland 21114, United States

Functionalizing nanoparticles with biological molecules: developing chemistries that facilitate nanotechnology.

Advances in top-down and bottom-up surface nanofabrication: techniques, applications & future prospects.

As defined by the European Commission, nanomaterial is a natural, incidental or manufactured material containing particles in an unbound state or as an aggregate or agglomerate in which ≥ 50% of the particles in the number size distribution have one or more external dimensions in the size range 1 to 100 nm. In specific cases and where warranted by concerns for the environment, health, safety or competition, the number size distribution threshold of 50% may be replaced with a threshold between 1 and 50%.1 Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) refer to man-made nanomaterials. Materials in the nanometer range often possess unique physical, optical, electronic, and biological properties compared with larger particles, such as the strength of graphene,2 the electronic properties of carbon nanotubes (CNTs),3 the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles4 and the optical properties of quantum dots (QDs).5 The unique and advanced properties of ENMs have led to a rapid increase in their application. These applications include aerospace and airplanes, energy, architecture, chemicals and coatings, catalysts, environmental protection, computer memory, biomedicine and consumer products. Driven by these demands, the worldwide ENM production volume in 2016 is conservatively estimated in a market report by Future Markets to be 44,267 tons or ≥ $5 billion.6

As the production and applications of ENMs rapidly expand, their environmental impacts and effects on human health are becoming increasingly significant.7 Due to their small sizes, ENMs are easily made airborne.8 However, no accurate method to quantitatively measure their concentration in air currently exists. A recently reported incident of severe pulmonary fibrosis caused by inhaled polymer nanoparticles in seven female workers obtained much attention.9 In addition to the release of ENM waste from industrial sites, a major release of ENMs to environmental water occurs due to home and personal use of appliances, cosmetics and personal products, such as shampoo and sunscreen.10 Airborne and aqueous ENMs pose immediate danger to the human respiratory and gastrointestinal systems. ENMs may enter other human organs after they are absorbed into the bloodstream through the gastrointestinal or respiratory systems.11,12 Furthermore, ENMs in cosmetics and personal care products, such as lotion, sunscreen and shampoo may enter human circulation through skin penetration.13 ENMs are very persistent in the environment and are slowly degraded. The dissolved metal ions from ENMs can also revert back to nanoparticles under natural conditions.14 ENMs are stored in plants, microbes and animal organs and can be transferred and accumulated through the food chain.15,16 In addition to the accidental entry of ENMs into human and biological systems, ENMs are also purposefully injected into or enter humans for medicinal and diagnostic purposes.17 Therefore, interactions of ENMs with biological systems are inevitable.

In addition to engineered nanomaterials, there are also naturally existing nanomaterials such as proteins and DNA molecules, which are key components of biological systems. These materials, combined with lipids and organic and inorganic small molecules, form the basic units of living systems –cells.18 To elucidate how nanomaterials affect organs and physiological functions, a thorough understanding of how nanomaterials perturb cells and biological molecules is required (Figure 1). Rapidly accumulating evidence indicates that ENMs interact with the basic components of biological systems, such as proteins, DNA molecules and cells.19-21 The driving forces for such interactions are quite complex and include the size, shape and surface properties (e.g., hydrophobicity, hydrogen-bonding capability, pi-bonds and stereochemical interactions) of ENMs.22-25



Figure 1

Interactions of nanoparticles with biological systems at different levels. Nanoparticles enter the human body through various pathways, reaching different organs and contacting tissues and cells. All of these interactions are based on nanoparticle-biomacromolecule ...



Evidence also indicates that chemical modifications on a nanoparticle’s surface alter its interactions with biological systems.26-28 These observations not only support the hypothesis that basic nano-bio interactions are mainly physicochemical in nature but also provide a powerful approach to controlling the nature and strength of a nanoparticle’s interactions with biological systems. Practically, a thorough understanding of the fundamental chemical interactions between nanoparticles and biological systems has two direct impacts. First, this knowledge will encourage and assist experimental approaches to chemically modify nanoparticle surfaces for various industrial or medicinal applications. Second, a range of chemical information can be combined with computational methods to investigate nano-biological properties and predict desired nanoparticle properties to direct experiments.29-31

The literature regarding nanoparticle-biological system interactions has increased exponentially in the past decade (Figure 2). However, a mechanistic understanding of the chemical basis for such complex interactions is still lacking. This review intends to explore such an understanding in the context of recent publications.



Figure 2

An analysis of literature statistics indicates growing concern for the topics that are the focus of this review. The number of publications and citations were obtained using the keywords “nanoparticles” and “biological systems” ...



A breakthrough technology cannot prosper without wide acceptance from the public and society; that is, it must pose minimal harm to human health and the environment. Nanotechnology is now facing such a critical challenge. We must elucidate the effects of ENMs on biological systems (such as biological molecules, human cells, organs and physiological systems). Accumulating experimental evidence suggests that nanoparticles interact with biological systems at nearly every level, often causing unwanted physiological consequences. Elucidating these interactions is the goal of this review. This endeavor will help regulate the proper application of ENMs in various products and their release into the environment. A more significant mission of this review is to direct the development of “safe-by-design” ENMs, as their demands for and applications continue to increase.

Chemical Basis of Interactions Between Engineered Nanoparticles and Biological Systems

Approximately a third of the human proteome contains metal cations, either in form of cofactors with catalytic functions, or as structural support elements.1,2 To guarantee a proper maintenance of this metal ion pool, both at the cellular and whole organism levels, nature has evolved a highly sophisticated machinery comprised of a complex interplay between DNA, proteins, and biomolecules.3 Over the past decades, a steadily growing number of diseases have been identified, which are characterized by metal imbalance in cells and tissues. Among the most prominent examples rank Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease, two neurodegenerative disorders that involve abnormal accumulation of transition metals in brain tissue.4 While some progress has been made at understanding the molecular basis of these disorders, many important questions remain unanswered. For example, little is known about the cellular structures that are involved in transiently storing metal ions prior to their incorporation into metalloproteins or the fate of metal ions upon protein degradation. An important first step towards unraveling the regulatory mechanisms involved in trace metal transport, storage, and distribution represents the identification and quantification of the metals, ideally in context of their native physiological environment in tissues, cells, or even at the level of individual organelles and subcellular compartments.

Since the inception of the first histochemical methods for the microscopic demonstration of transition metals in tissues more than 140 years ago,5 many highly sensitive microanalytical techniques and instruments have been developed for the in situ analysis of trace metals. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the most recent achievements in trace metal imaging while at the same time also offering a historical perspective of this rapidly evolving research field. Although this survey has been structured according to the various analytical techniques, particular emphasis is given to the biological background for a better understanding of the context and importance of each discussed study.

An overview of the most important microanalytical techniques currently available for the in situ detection of trace metals in cells and tissues is compiled in Table 1. Depending on the task, each technique may offer specific advantages and, of course, also disadvantages. Currently, synchrotron- and focused ion-beam microprobes presumably offer the best combination of sensitivity and spatial resolution; however, the ionizing high-energy excitation beam is not compatible with studying live organisms. Conversely, techniques that have been specifically developed for physiological imaging in clinical medicine, notably magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography, inherently offer only a low spatial resolution and are merely suitable for obtaining information at the organ or tissue level. Although fluorescence microscopy based methods provide very high sensitivity down to the single molecule level while being at the same time compatible with live cell and tissue studies, scattering and limited penetration depth renders these techniques unsuitable for imaging opaque specimens. There are also important differences regarding the type of quantitative information that can be gained by each of these analytical techniques. For example, the histochemical detection with chromogenic and fluorogenic dyes relies on a competitive exchange of the metal ion within its native environment, most likely coordinated to endogenous ligands. Depending on the exchange kinetics and thermodynamic affinity of the histochemical indicator, only a fraction of the total metal ion contents in a cell or tissue can be probed. Nevertheless, this kinetically labile pool is particularly of interest in context of understanding the uptake, distribution, and regulation of trace elements at the cellular level, and in this regard, these methods offer unique opportunities to dynamically image metal ion fluxes in live cells with high sensitivity and spatial resolution. At the same time, organelles and proteins of interest can be readily labeled with genetically encoded green fluorescent protein tags,12 thus providing direct insights into dynamic processes within a larger cellular and biochemical context. In contrast, similar correlative information is difficult to gain with the fully quantitative micro beam methods, which require xenobiotic elemental tags for identifying subcellular structures. Autoradiographic tracer experiments offer much improved resolution over PET; however, the technique is only applicable to fixed or frozen tissues and cells. Furthermore, tracer studies cannot provide direct information regarding the endogenous metal composition of cells or tissues, and are therefore primarily limited to metal uptake, distribution, and release studies. Finally, mass spectrometric analyses are surface-based methods that destroy the sample while measuring its elemental composition. Clearly, only the combination of several analytical techniques and specific biochemical studies may lead to a fully comprehensive analysis of a biological system.



Table 1

Spatially resolved microanalytical techniques for in situ imaging of trace metals in biology.6–11




2. Histochemical Techniques
Histology is the branch of biology dealing with the study of microscopic anatomy of cells and tissues of plants and animals. Histological studies are typically carried out on thin sections of tissue or with cultured cells. To visualize and identify particular structures, a broad spectrum of histological stains and indicators are available. Among the most widely used dyes are hematoxylin and eosin, which stain nuclei blue and the cytoplasm pink, respectively.13 The history of detecting biological trace metal by histological methods dates back more than 140 years. Although these techniques have been today mostly replaced by the much more sensitive modern analytical methods described in this review article, histochemical approaches for visualizing metals mark the very beginning in the exploration of the inorganic physiology of transition metals. Given this special place in history, we deemed it necessary to briefly review some of the early achievements in this field.

2.1. Chromogenic Detection with Chelators and Ligands
Ever since the inception of Perls Prussian blue method for staining of non-heme iron, numerous indicators have been developed for the in situ visualization of trace metals in biological tissues and cells.13 Due to their limited sensitivity; however, most of these techniques were only suitable for the diagnosis of pathological conditions, typically associated with excess metal accumulations, thus preventing their application for routine staining of normal tissue. Furthermore, because the dyes are engaged in a competitive exchange equilibrium with endogenous ligands, histological stains are not suitable for the analytical determination of the total metal contents in tissues and thus limited to the visualization of the histologically reactive fraction of loosely bound labile metal ions.



2.1.1. Histochemistry of Iron 
The histochemical demonstration of labile iron reported by Perls in 1867 is among the earliest accounts describing the in situ visualization of a trace metal in biological tissues.5 The method was originally described by Grohe, who observed the formation of a blue coloration when he treated cadaver tissues with potassium ferrocyanide in acidic solution.14 Due to its low cost and simplicity, the technique is still used today for the histological visualization of non-heme iron. Some variations focused on optimizing the concentrations and proportions of the reagents,15–17 among which Lison’s protocol17 appears to be most popular today. An intensification of Perls’ staining can be obtained by exploiting the use of ferric ferrocyanide in catalyzing the oxidation of diaminobenzidine (DAB) to polymeric benzidine black by hydrogen peroxide.18

An alternative method employs the reaction of ferricyanide with Fe(II) resulting in Turnbull blue.19 Since almost all of the Fe in tissues is in the ferric form, the staining procedure requires the in situ conversion of Fe(III) to Fe(II) with ammonium sulfide.15 Due to often incomplete reduction, the method never gained much attention. More recently, an application of Turnbull blue, named the ‘perfusion Turnbull method’ has been developed, where in vivo perfusion of acidic ferricyanide is followed by DAB intensification.20 The direct in vivo perfusion avoids artifacts associated with tissue fixation, including the loss of loosely bound iron and oxidation of Fe(II) to Fe(III). Similarly, Perls method was modified by employing in vivo perfusion with acidic ferrocyanide. Both methods are capable of identifying organs and tissues containing histochemically reactive iron over a broad pH range, including the low endosomal pH.21,22

The history of iron histochemistry would be incomplete without mentioning Quincke’s method, which employed ammonium sulfide for the precipitation of tissue iron as its sulfide.23 A detailed account on the various techniques, including a comprehensive historical overview of non-heme iron chemistry, has been recently published.24

In Situ Imaging of Metals in Cells and Tissues

Mitochondrial dysfunctions cause numerous human disorders. A platform technology based on biodegradable polymers for carrying bioactive molecules to the mitochondrial matrix could be of enormous potential benefit in treating mitochondrial diseases. Here we report a rationally designed mitochondria-targeted polymeric nanoparticle (NP) system and its optimization for efficient delivery of various mitochondria-acting therapeutics by blending a targeted poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid)-block (PLGA-b)-poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-triphenylphosphonium (TPP) polymer (PLGA-b-PEG-TPP) with either nontargeted PLGA-b-PEG-OH or PLGA-COOH. An optimized formulation was identified through in vitro screening of a library of charge- and size-varied NPs, and mitochondrial uptake was studied by qualitative and quantitative investigations of cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions of cells treated with blended NPs composed of PLGA-b-PEG-TPP and a triblock copolymer containing a fluorescent quantum dot, PLGA-b-PEG-QD. The versatility of this platform was demonstrated by studying various mitochondria-acting therapeutics for different applications, including the mitochondria-targeting chemotherapeutics lonidamine and α-tocopheryl succinate for cancer, the mitochondrial antioxidant curcumin for Alzheimer’s disease, and the mitochondrial uncoupler 2,4-dinitrophenol for obesity. These biomolecules were loaded into blended NPs with high loading efficiencies. Considering efficacy, the targeted PLGA-b-PEG-TPP NP provides a remarkable improvement in the drug therapeutic index for cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and obesity compared with the nontargeted construct or the therapeutics in their free form. This work represents the potential of a single, programmable NP platform for the diagnosis and targeted delivery of therapeutics for mitochondrial dysfunction-related diseases.

https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/109/40/16288.full.pdf

Engineering of blended nanoparticle platform for delivery of mitochondria-acting therapeutics

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) oligonucleotides hybridize to matching DNA sequences in cells, as established in the literature, depending on active transcription of the target sequence and local molarity of the oligonucleotide. We investigated the intracellular distribution of nanoconjugates composed of DNA oligonucleotides attached to TiO2 nanoparticles, thus creating a locally increased concentration of the oligonucleotide. Two types of nanoconjugates, with oligonucleotides matching mitochondrial or nucleolar DNA, were specifically retained in mitochondria or nucleoli.

Intracellular Distribution of TiO2−DNA Oligonucleotide Nanoconjugates Directed to Nucleolus and Mitochondria Indicates Sequence Specificity

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Chung Lee

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Intracellular Distribution of TiO2−DNA Oligonucleotide Nanoconjugates Directed to Nucleolus and Mitochondria Indicates Sequence Specificity