자연주의적 탐구조사(Naturalistic Inquiry)

Background and Aims:The lack of consensus on how to define and grade adverse postoperative events has greatly hampered the evaluation of surgical procedures. A new classification of complications, initiated in 1992, was updated 5 years ago. It is based on the type of therapy needed to correct the co

The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula : 11 Years After

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: A suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)

http://www.swscn.org.uk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/IPMN_International-consensus-guidelines-20121.pdf

International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas

State of the Art on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection: IHPBA 2016 Conference

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/articlepdf/2758227/jamasurgery_trudeau_2019_le_190053.pdf

Prognostic Value of Pancreatic Fistula in Resected Patients With Pancreatic Cancer With Neoadjuvant Therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about whether the 2006 Sendai guidelines or 2012 Fukuoka guidelines are being used to determine the level of risk posed by suspected pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms (PCNs). We evaluated whether the guidelines accurately predicted which patients with suspected PCNs, which was based on cross-sectional imaging findings, would be found to have advanced neoplasia in surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of data collected from 194 patients with cystic lesions of the pancreas, which were assessed by cross-sectional imaging analyses, who underwent surgery for suspected PCNs at the Hospital at the University of Pennsylvania from 2000 through 2008. Imaging data were used to classify patients according to the Sendai guidelines as high risk or low risk and according to the Fukuoka guidelines as high risk, worrisome, or low risk. Pathology analyses of samples collected during surgery were used as the reference. A logistic regression model was created to identify factors associated with advanced neoplasia. The Sendai and Fukuoka guideline criteria were analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Advanced neoplasias were found in 36 patients (18.5%; 22 invasive cancers and 14 high-grade dysplasias). The median size of cysts was 33 mm. All patients found to have invasive cancers were accurately assigned to the Sendai guidelines high risk or Fukuoka guidelines high risk groups. However, 3 patients in the Sendai guidelines low risk and 2 patients in the Fukuoka guidelines low risk groups were found to have high-grade dysplasia. The Sendai guidelines identified patients with advanced neoplasia with 91.7% sensitivity, 21.5% specificity, 21% positive predictive value, and 91.9% negative predictive value. A designation of Fukuoka guidelines high risk identified patients with advanced neoplasia with 55.6% sensitivity, 73% specificity, 32% positive predictive value, and 87.9% negative predictive value. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference between the guidelines in predicting which patients had advanced neoplasia. On multivariate analysis, the presence of a mural nodule (odds ratio [OR], 2.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33–6.27; P [ .008), dilated main pancreatic duct >10 mm (OR, 7.44; 95% CI, 2.36–23.52; P [ .001), or enhancing solid component (OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.16–7.64; P [ .02) were associated with detection of advanced neoplasia in pancreatic cysts. CONCLUSION: On the basis of a retrospective analysis, the Sendai and Fukuoka guidelines accurately determine which patients with pancreatic cysts have advanced neoplasia. The guidelines accurately recommended surgical resection for all patients found to have invasive cancer, although some patients with high-grade dysplasia were missed. The updated Fukuoka guidelines are not superior to the Sendai guidelines in identifying neoplasias. Cyst size was not associated with advanced neoplasia.

https://www.cghjournal.org/article/S1542-3565(15)00303-1/pdf

PANCREAS, BILIARY TRACT, AND LIVER Sendai and Fukuoka Consensus Guidelines Identify Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Suspected Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas


 Introduction: In the setting of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), lower baseline plasma KRAS mutation levels have been associated with improved survival. While tissue-agnostic, plasma-based copy number instability (CNI) has been demonstrated as an early indicator of response to immunotherapy for some solid tumors, it has not been assessed for patients with mPDAC, nor in combination with KRAS mutations for patients receiving standard of care chemo/radiotherapy. Here we evaluate the combination of mutant KRAS (mKRAS) and CNI detection in plasma as a predictor of overall and progression-free survival (OS/PFS) in mPDAC patients who received standard of care therapy.
 Methods: Cell-free DNA was extracted from plasma and libraries prepared at baseline (Week 0) and weeks 8, 16 and 24 on therapy, and analyzed by next-generation sequencing (CNI) and droplet digital PCR (mKRAS). Descriptive statistics were computed for variables including CNI (score is a measure of circulating tumor DNA) and mKRAS variant allele fraction. Detection was defined as above the limit of detection (mKRAS=0.13%) and above the 95th percentile of the value in normal individuals (CNI=24). Therapy response was assessed by OS and PFS.
 Results: 196 plasma samples from 64 mPDAC patients were analyzed. When dichotomized as detectable vs undetectable, CNI alone was significantly associated with OS at all on-therapy timepoints but not baseline, whereas mKRAS was significantly associated with OS for all 4 timepoints (Table 1). Detection of both CNI and mKRAS in combination was strongly associated with worse OS at all timepoints, yielding the highest HR. Similar results were obtained when mKRAS and CNI were dichotomized at their respective median values or with PFS as the clinical endpoint.
 Conclusions: Combined CNI and mKRAS detection at baseline and on-therapy may provide a strong and early indication of worse prognosis for patients with mPDAC.
 Table 1. Association of CNI and mKRAS with Overall Survival (HazardRatio [95% CI], log-rank p-value) Timepoint CNI mKRAS CNI and KRAS Baseline/Week 0 1.54 [0.89-2.68], 0.1 2.05 [1.12-3.78], 0.02 2.50 [1.46-4.28], 0.0006 Week 8 1.78 [0.99-3.18], 0.05 2.21 [1.19-4.08], 0.01 9.81 [3.40-28.28], <0.0001 Week 16 1.91 [1.03-3.53], 0.04 3.26 [1.60-6.62], 0.0006 11.11 [4.28-28.83], <0.0001 Week 24 2.55 [1.28-5.09], 0.006 4.55 [2.03-10.23], <0.0001 6.42 [2.61-15.84], <0.0001
 Citation Format: Samuele Cannas, Jacob E. Till, Kristine Kim, Michael J. LaRiviere, Charles M. Vollmer, Jennifer R. Eads, Thomas B. Karasic, Peter J. O'Dwyer, Charles J. Schneider, Ursina R. Teitelbaum, Kim A. Reiss Binder, Mark H. O'Hara, Douglas T. Ross, Kim McGregor, Kirsten Bornemann-Kolatzki, Ekkehard Schütz, Julia Beck, Erica L. Carpenter. Liquid biopsy signature combining copy number instability and mutant KRAS detection is associated with survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1043.

Abstract 1043: Liquid biopsy signature combining copy number instability and mutant KRAS detection is associated with survival for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Around the World: Are We Seeing Things the Same Way?

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Charles M. Vollmer

Author Tools

Chat about Author