Field walking tests are commonly employed to evaluate exercise capacity, assess prognosis and evaluate treatment response in chronic respiratory diseases. In recent years, there has been a wealth of new literature pertinent to the conduct of the 6-min walk test (6MWT), and a growing evidence base describing the incremental and endurance shuttle walk tests (ISWT and ESWT, respectively). The aim of this document is to describe the standard operating procedures for the 6MWT, ISWT and ESWT, which can be consistently employed by clinicians and researchers. The Technical Standard was developed by a multidisciplinary and international group of clinicians and researchers with expertise in the application of field walking tests. The procedures are underpinned by a concurrent systematic review of literature relevant to measurement properties and test conduct in adults with chronic respiratory disease. Current data confirm that the 6MWT, ISWT and ESWT are valid, reliable and responsive to change with some interventions. However, results are sensitive to small changes in methodology. It is important that two tests are conducted for the 6MWT and ISWT. This Technical Standard for field walking tests reflects current evidence regarding procedures that should be used to achieve robust results.

/pdf/an-official-european-respiratory-society-american-thoracic-325dl96pb4.pdf

An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society Technical Standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease

Principles of exercise testing and interpretation

This systematic review examined the measurement properties of the 6-min walk test (6MWT), incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) and endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT) in adults with chronic respiratory disease. Studies that report the evaluation or use of the 6MWT, ISWT or ESWT were included. We searched electronic databases for studies published between January 2000 and September 2013. The 6-min walking distance (6MWD) is a reliable measure (intra-class correlation coefficients ranged from 0.82 to 0.99 in seven studies). There is a learning effect, with greater distance walked on the second test (pooled mean improvement of 26 m in 13 studies). Reliability was similar for ISWT and ESWT, with a learning effect also evident for ISWT (pooled mean improvement of 20 m in six studies). The 6MWD correlates more strongly with peak work capacity (r50.59-0.93) and physical activity (r50.40-0.85) than with respiratory function (r50.10-0.59). Methodological factors affecting 6MWD include track length, encouragement, supplemental oxygen and walking aids. Supplemental oxygen also affects ISWT and ESWT performance. Responsiveness was moderate to high for all tests, with greater responsiveness to interventions that included exercise training. The findings of this review demonstrate that the 6MWT, ISWT and ESWT are robust tests of functional exercise capacity in adults with chronic respiratory disease.

https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/44/6/1447.full.pdf

An official systematic review of the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society: measurement properties of field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease

Accurate assessment of the amount and intensity of physical activity in daily life is considered very important due to the close relationship between physical activity level, health, disability and mortality. For this reason, assessment of physical activity in daily life has gained interest in recent years, especially in sedentary populations, such as patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The present article aims to compare and discuss the two kinds of instruments more commonly used to quantify the amount of physical activity performed by COPD patients in daily life: subjective methods (questionnaires, diaries) and motion sensors (electronic or mechanical methods). Their characteristics are summarised and evidence of their validity, reliability and sensitivity is discussed, when available. Subjective methods have practical value mainly in providing the patients' view on their performance in activities of daily living and functional status. However, care must be taken when using subjective methods to accurately quantify the amount of daily physical activity performed. More accurate information is likely to be available with motion sensors rather than questionnaires. The selection of which motion sensor to use for quantification of physical activity in daily life should depend mainly on the purpose of its use.

https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/27/5/1040.full.pdf

Quantifying physical activity in daily life with questionnaires and motion sensors in COPD

Reference values for the 6-min walk test in healthy subjects 20–50 years old

PURPOSE This study evaluated the concurrent criterion validity of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) with respect to standard physiologic work capacity indices in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and compared its performance with similar surrogates. METHODS 119 patients with moderate to severe COPD (86 men, 33 women) completed medical and smoking histories, physical examination, pulmonary function testing (PFT), cycle ergometry (CE), arm ergometry (AE), and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), DASI, the Sickness Impact Profile-68 (SIP-68) and the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRDQ). Correlation methods were used to assess the validity of the potential surrogates DASI and the domain scores for SIP-68 and CRDQ, with the standards CE, AE, PFT, and 6MWD (as a standard). RESULTS The mean DASI score was 33.4 +/- 13.0. Significant Pearson correlations (P <.01) were observed between the DASI and PFT outcomes maximum voluntary ventilation (r =.28); peak expiratory flow (r =.21); diffusion capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (r =.30). For CE, the correlations with DASI were oxygen consumption (VO(2))(r =.34); minute ventilation (r =.25); watts (r =.37). For AE, the correlations with DASI were VO(2) (r=.38); watts (r =.47). For 6MWD, the correlation was r =.53. Higher correlations were obtained for the distance completed during the first minute of the 6MWD and ergometric indices as well as DASI scores: watts(AE) (r =.39); VO(2AE) (r =.45); watts(CE) (r =.50); VO(2CE) (r =.44). Correlation coefficients for all SIP-68 and CRDQ domain and total scores were lower than corresponding correlations obtained for the DASI. Regression analysis demonstrated that the DASI and 6MWD were important (P <.05) for predicting VO(2) or work for CE while DASI and SIP range or CRDQ dyspnea entered for AE, when gender, age, BMI, and the FEV1 were forced into the model. In forward stepwise analyses, DASI entered first for AE, and 6MWD entered first for CE. The DASI was selected in 3 of 4 models with R(2) values ranging from.47 to.70. SIP-68 and CRDQ subscores were significant as additional predictors. CONCLUSIONS DASI has high criterion validity for predicting CE and/or AE outcomes in the COPD population. It is warranted in addition to the 6MWD, and its predictive significance and simplicity recommends it over several other self-administered instruments for evaluating functional capacity.

Criterion validity of the Duke Activity Status Index for assessing functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

6-Minute Walk Work for Assessment of Functional Capacity in Patients With COPD

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Carol Grothues

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Criterion validity of the Duke Activity Status Index for assessing functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

6-Minute Walk Work for Assessment of Functional Capacity in Patients With COPD