The relative importance of mangroves and seagrass beds as feeding areas for resident and transient fishes among different mangrove habitats in Florida and Belize: Evidence from dietary and stable-isotope analyses

A review of mangrove and seagrass ecosystems and their linkage to fisheries and fisheries management

It is common practice in ecology to extrapolate understanding of processes and functions from one example of an ecosystem to another. Valid extrapolation requires an assumption of ecosystem equivalence, i.e. that the different examples of the ecosystem are actually similar in regard to the understanding being extrapolated. I use the example of mangrove fish assemblages to assess ecosystem equivalence using data compiled from 76 studies from around the world. Although there were distinct fish faunal groups (FGs) in different areas of the world, there was evidence of underlying faunal equivalence. Mangrove fish comprised a restricted pool of 170 families, with 41 of those occurring in all 4 FGs. Whether studies only considered fish actually entering mangrove forests or included associated habitats was not an important factor for differentiating assemblages. This suggests that from a fish perspective, the mangrove ecosystem is defined at a whole-of-mangrove system level rather than the scale of the mangrove forest. There were notable differences among families that distinguished the different FGs, but these differences did not translate into functional differences. Although the results appear to provide a degree of validity for extrapolating understanding of processes and functions from one example of an ecosystem to another, this implied support must be set in the context of the limitations of the available data. In-depth evaluation of ecosystem equivalence is urgently needed because this untested assumption is central to the validity of every model or interpretation based on data from a distant location.

/pdf/ecosystem-equivalence-and-the-ability-to-generalise-insights-3bbpj0v1a8.pdf

Ecosystem equivalence and the ability to generalise: insights from global consistencies in mangrove fish assemblages

†U. S. Geological Survey, Florida Integrated Science Center, 7920 NW 71st Street,Gainesville, FL 32653, U.S.A. and ‡U. S. Geological Survey, Florida Integrated ScienceCenter, Everglades National Park Field Station, 40001 State Road 9336, Homestead,FL 33034, U.S.A.(Received 7 March 2008, Accepted 31 December 2008)

Salinityeffectsonbehaviouralresponsetohypoxiainthe non-native Mayan cichlid Cichlasoma urophthalmus from Florida Everglades wetlands

Dichotomy of mangrove management: A review of research and policy in the Mesoamerican reef region

We investigated the effects of mangrove cutting on fish assemblages in Twin Cays, Belize, in two habitat types. We conducted visual censuses at two sites in adjoining undisturbed/disturbed (30%–70% of shoreline fringe removed) sub-tidal fringing Rhizophora mangle Linnaeus, 1753. Observers recorded significantly more species and individuals in undisturbed sites, especially among smaller, schooling species (e.g., atherinids, clupeids), where densities were up to 200 times greater in undisturbed habitat. Multivariate analyses showed distinct species assemblages between habitats at both sites. In addition, extensive trapping with wire minnow traps within the intertidal zone in both undisturbed and disturbed fringing and transition (landward) mangrove forests was conducted. Catch rates were low: 638 individuals from 24 species over 563 trap-nights. Trap data, however, indicated that mangrove disturbance had minimal effect on species composition in either forest type (fringe/ transition). different results from the two methods (and habitat types) may be explained by two factors: (1) a larger and more detectable species pool in the subtidal habitat, with visual “access” to all species, and (2) the selective nature of trapping. Our data indicate that even partial clearing of shoreline and more landward mangroves can have a significant impact on local fish assemblages. Among subtropical and tropical coastal marine habitats, mangroves are regarded as unusually biologically diverse and quite productive. In addition, the importance of mangroves in shoreline stabilization and protection of the terrestrial interface, and the linkages to adjacent marine systems (e.g., seagrasses/coral reefs) was recognized long ago (Lugo and Snedaker, 1974). Within the perceived resource values of the mangal is that of a nursery area for juvenile coral reef fishes. The literature is replete with discussions of this nursery concept, and the debate is ongoing. Beck et al. (2001) defined general guidelines for describing marine nursery areas, which included (1) greater densities of juveniles, (2) faster growth rates, (3) enhanced juvenile survival, and (4) successful movement to adult habitats. Nagelkerken et al. (2000) provided a summary of the various aspects of the nursery hypotheses specific to the mangal, the primary bases of which are predator avoidance, food abundance, and larval settlement. Contributing to these aspects are (1) the high structural complexity of the mangal, which both protects against predators and intercepts entrained fish larvae, (2) relatively remote locations from reef or offshore waters, reducing proximity to predators, (3) enhanced turbidity, reducing predation efficiency, (4) high autochthonous food production, and (5) areal extent that could intercept planktonic fish larvae at greater frequency than the reef itself. Many early assumptions of nursery value for both mangroves and seagrasses are now being challenged, since they were based on qualitative observations, with no separation of information on fish size or juvenile/adult ratios (Nagelkerken et al., 2000). Faunce and Serafy (2006) indicated that there is evidence that many fish species use the mangal as a diurnal refuge, and thus some of the fisheries production assumed to have originated there may have other sources. BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, vOL. 80, NO. 3, 2007 880 The nursery role of mangroves may be strongest at broad scales. For example, the areal extent of mangroves is assumed to correlate with secondary production in the commercial fish catch (Manson et al., 2005). Mumby et al. (2004) estimated fish biomass at three Caribbean atolls with no or very limited mangrove cover and compared them with “mangrove-rich” systems (defined as having ≥ 70 km2 of fringing Rhizophora mangle Linnaeus, 1753 within an area of 200 km2). Fish biomass was much greater (up to 25 times for some species) on the reef systems with abundant, adjacent mangroves. The study concluded that mangroves clearly offer an intermediate nursery area that provides a transition between seagrass beds and patch reefs. The data of Mumby et al. (2004) (comparing intact vs naturally “barren” areas) provide, at best, an indication of the consequences on fisheries of human-caused mangrove destruction. The rate of worldwide mangrove deforestation (now at 35% globally) is highest in the Americas, where it is now estimated at 2251 km2 yr–1 (valiela et al., 2001). With destruction of the mangal so common, it is not surprising that studies assessing the effects of human changes are abundant, but most of this work has focused on the Pacific, and much of the emphasis has been on invertebrates and the physical changes following mangrove alteration (water chemistry/sediment characteristics; Manson et al., 2005). Surprisingly, studies examining the effects of alteration on fishes directly associated with the mangal are sparse. We note only one study (Ellis, 2003) that has examined mangrove canopy trimming (Rookery Bay, FL, USA) and the effect on fish assemblages. No effect on overall assemblage structure was found with moderate trimming and the author concluded that alterations to the habitat may have to be significant before changes occur, as variability between samples was very great in the sites studied. In addition, there are few data on how fishes respond to natural environmental variability within the mangal (Faunce and Serafy, 2006). We believe that to slow the rate of mangrove deforestation, empirical data are needed on the effects of mangrove shoreline alteration on associated fish assemblages. here, we examine the effects of mangrove removal on fishes inhabiting the intertidal and subtidal mangroves on one of the Belize cays.

Mangrove removal in the belize cays: effects on mangrove-associated fish assemblages in the intertidal and subtidal

An assessment of ichthyofaunal assemblages within the mangal of the Belize offshore cays

We assessed ichthyofaunal diversity within Belizean offshore cay mangroves during three sampling events (20032005). A variety of sampling gears (n=9 types nets/traps) were deployed in pre-defined habitats: fringe, transition, dwarf red, internal creek, pond, sinkhole. A total of 2,586 gear sets was completed and 8,131 individuals collected, comprising 75 species. Water quality data (temperature, salinity, DO) were taken during most collections. Minnow trap data from the various micro-habitats tested indicates some overlap in assemblages. Significant differences in water quality were also noted, with the fringe presenting the best conditions and sinkhole the worst. We also conducted extensive visual surveys around the fringe at a number of cays, tallying an additional 67 species. The fringe is the most diverse (128 species) and sinkhole least (12 species). An overall total of 142 species from 55 families has therefore been documented from the cays, and all but eight species were found on Twin Cays alone. This figure is among the highest reported for oceanic mangroves in this biogeographic realm. Our comprehensive approach with a variety of gear-types in a wide range of micro-habitats, combined with visual observation, lends credence to the conclusion that most ichthyological species accounts for the mangal are often perhaps underestimates.

The rich ichthyofaunal diversity within the mangal of the Belize offshore cays

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

C.C. McIvor

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Mangrove removal in the belize cays: effects on mangrove-associated fish assemblages in the intertidal and subtidal

An assessment of ichthyofaunal assemblages within the mangal of the Belize offshore cays

The rich ichthyofaunal diversity within the mangal of the Belize offshore cays