Avishalom Tor
University of Notre Dame
64 Papers
358 Citations
Avishalom Tor is an academic researcher from University of Notre Dame. The author has contributed to research in topics: Rationality & Competition (economics). The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 58 publications. Previous affiliations of Avishalom Tor include University of Michigan & Harvard University.
Chat about Author
Papers
The Psychology of Competition: A Social Comparison Perspective.
TL;DR: This paper proposed a new model that distinguishes between individual and situational factors that increase social comparison and thus lead to a range of competitive attitudes and behavior, which is an important source of competitive behavior.
412
Ranks and Rivals: A Theory of Competition
TL;DR: The present analysis reveals that the degree of competition between commensurate rivals depends on their proximity to a meaningful standard, and examines the psychological processes underlying this phenomenon to reveal that similarity to a standard exerts a direct impact on the basic unidirectional drive upward, beyond the established effects of commensurability and dimension relevance.
•Posted Content
The Psychology of Competition: A Social Comparison Perspective
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a new model that distinguishes between individual and situational factors that increase social comparison and thus lead to a range of competitive attitudes and behavior, which is an important source of competitive behavior.
138
Rankings, standards, and competition : Task vs. scale comparisons
Stephen M. Garcia,Avishalom Tor +1 more
TL;DR: Garcia et al. as discussed by the authors showed that an upward comparison on the scale (e.g., being surpassed in rank), rather than in the mere task (i.e., being outperformed), is necessary to generate competition among rivals proximate to a standard.
113
•Posted Content
Rankings, Standards, and Competition: Task vs. Scale Comparisons
Stephen M. Garcia,Avishalom Tor +1 more
TL;DR: Garcia et al. as mentioned in this paper showed that an upward comparison on the scale (e.g., being surpassed in rank), rather than in the mere task (e., being outperformed), is necessary to generate competition among rivals proximate to a standard.
96