Anna V. Fisher
Carnegie Mellon University
104 Papers
352 Citations
Anna V. Fisher is an academic researcher from Carnegie Mellon University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Categorization & Cognition. The author has an hindex of 22, co-authored 100 publications. Previous affiliations of Anna V. Fisher include Ohio State University.
Chat about Author
Papers
Labels: Category Markers or Objects Features? Or How Rocks and Stones are Different from Bunnies and Rabbits
Anna V. Fisher
- 01 Jan 2007
TL;DR: Fisher et al. as mentioned in this paper found that even very young children rely on semantically related labels (such as bunny and rabbit or puppy and dog) when performing inductive generalization.
Dissociation between Categorization and Induction Early in Development: Evidence for Similarity-Based Induction
Anna V. Fisher,Heidi Kloos,Valdimir M. Sloutsky +2 more
- 01 Jan 2005
TL;DR: Kloos et al. as discussed by the authors found that children between 4 and 5 years of age participated in two types of tasks: categorization and induction, with participants readily classified items based on category membership, but they ignored category membership during induction and instead based their responses on the appearance of items.
The Development of Induction: From Similarity-Based to Category-Based - eScholarship
Anna V. Fisher,Valdimir M. Sloutsky +1 more
- 01 Jan 2004
TL;DR: For instance, Sloutsky et al. as discussed by the authors have shown that infants and very young children perform induction by detecting multiple correspondences, or similarities, among presented entities (e.g., "new" pictures that belong to the same category as "old" pictures), and this differential processing underlying children's and adults' induction results in different memory traces, and affects accuracy on a subsequent memory test.
•Journal Article
More like a bee, less like a spider, and not like a tomato: Ecologically-valid enrichment experiences promote changes in how young children differentiate biological categories.
TL;DR: Direct evidence is provided that repeated experience with a biological domain in an ecologically-valid setting changed children’s category representations, with increased differentiation of items within that domain and relative to a second domain.
1