Ann Johnson
University of Utah
12 Papers
22 Citations
Ann Johnson is an academic researcher from University of Utah. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Institutional review board. The author has an hindex of 2, co-authored 5 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
An Analysis of Differences in Success Rates of Male and Female Debaters
Jon Bruschke,Ann Johnson +1 more
TL;DR: For instance, the authors examined the effect of gender on the success of female and male debaters in NDT debates and found that female debaters had higher average speaker points compared to males.
15
Implementing a Central IRB Model in a Multicenter Research Network.
Jeri Burr,Ann Johnson,Valeriya Vasenina,Stephanie Bisping,R. Whitney Coleman,Jeffrey R. Botkin,J. Michael Dean +6 more
- 01 May 2019
TL;DR: An NIH-funded network that proactively instituted a central IRB (CIRB) in 2012 is described, anticipating the NIH future mandate, and is now fully functioning under a CIRB model.
9
Key lessons and strategies for implementing single IRB review in the Trial Innovation Network
Ann Johnson,Megan Kasimatis Singleton,Julie A. Ozier,Emily Serdoz,Jenni Beadles,Janelle Maddox-Regis,Sarah Mumford,Jeri Burr,J. Michael Dean,Daniel E. Ford,Gordon R. Bernard +10 more
TL;DR: The Trial Innovation Network (TIN) as mentioned in this paper has established an infrastructure for single IRB review in response to federal policies, which has successfully supported over 70 multisite studies via more than 800 reliance arrangements.
Engaging key stakeholders to overcome barriers to studying the quality of research ethics oversight
Emily E. Anderson,Elisa A. Hurley,Kimberley Serpico,Ann Johnson,Jessica Rowe,Megan Kasimatis Singleton,Barbara E. Bierer,Brooke Cholka,Swapnali Chaudhari,Holly Fernandez Lynch +9 more
TL;DR: In this paper , a group of HRPP professionals and researchers actively involved in a research consortium focused on IRB quality and effectiveness, identify potential levers for supporting and encouraging HRPP and IRB engagement in research on quality and effective.
3
Providing Public Engagement Training to Build Connections Between the Community and Research Ethics Professionals: A Pilot Project
TL;DR: The STEM Ambassador Program as discussed by the authors provides a promising framework for training research ethics professionals to form authentic community connections and carry out effective engagement activities based on shared interests and values, and the experiences of ten research administrators who participated in a pilot of the STEM Ambassador training for research Ethics professionals are presented.
3