Andrew Bartlett
University of York
30 Papers
67 Citations
Andrew Bartlett is an academic researcher from University of York. The author has contributed to research in topics: Psychiatric genetics & Discipline. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 26 publications. Previous affiliations of Andrew Bartlett include Cardiff University & University of Sheffield.
Chat about Author
Papers
The Imitation Game and the Nature of Mixed Methods
Harold Maurice Collins,Robert Evans,Martin Weinel,Jennifer Lyttleton-Smith,Andrew Bartlett,Martin Hall +5 more
TL;DR: The Imitation Game as discussed by the authors is a new research method that collects both qualitative and quantitative data, and which can be used as a mixed methods procedure in many disciplines, such as sociology of scientific knowledge and studies of expertise and experience.
Hidden in the Middle: Culture, Value and Reward in Bioinformatics
TL;DR: This paper concentrates on the problems of reward and recognition described by scientists working in academic bioinformatics in the United Kingdom, recognising that the mismatches in knowledge take place not just at the level of the practical, theoretical, or epistemological, but also at the cultural level too.
Complexity and accountability: the witches' brew of psychiatric genetics.
TL;DR: It is shown that the rhetorical construction of complexity in scientific review papers is oriented to bridging disciplinary boundaries, marshalling new resources and reconstructing expectations that justify delays in gene discovery and risk prediction.
Genome editing: the dynamics of continuity, convergence, and change in the engineering of life
Paul Martin,Michael Morrison,Ilke Turkmendag,Brigitte Nerlich,Aisling McMahon,Stevienna de Saille,Andrew Bartlett +6 more
TL;DR: It will be argued that genome editing is best understood as a technology platform that is being powerfully shaped by this existing regime but is starting to disrupt the governance of biotechnology.
26
•Dissertation
Accomplishing sequencing the human genome
Andrew Bartlett
- 01 Jan 2008
TL;DR: The study finds that work at the Institute was quite unlike the dehumanising, alienating work that might be expected as a result of the 'industrialisation' of science, rather, the work of sequencing genomes recruited the sentiments of those working at the institute, producing committed workers.
21