/pdf/mechanical-power-meaning-uses-and-limitations-34v2115j.pdf

Mechanical power: meaning, uses and limitations

Purpose of review We review the evidence on the use of noninvasive respiratory supports (noninvasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy) in patients with acute respiratory failure because of severe community-acquired pneumonia. Recent findings Noninvasive ventilation is strongly advised for the treatment of hypercapnic respiratory failure and recent evidence justifies its use in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure when delivered by helmet. Indeed, such interface allows alveolar recruitment by providing high level of positive end-expiratory pressure, which improves hypoxemia. On the other hand, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is effective in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure and some articles support its use in patients with hypercapnia. However, early identification of noninvasive respiratory supports treatment failure is crucial to prevent delayed orotracheal intubation and protective invasive mechanical ventilation. Summary Noninvasive ventilation is the first-line therapy in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure because of pneumonia. Although an increasing amount of evidence investigated the application of noninvasive respiratory support to hypoxemic respiratory failure, the optimal ventilatory strategy in this setting is uncertain. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation delivered by helmet and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy appear as promising tools but their role needs to be confirmed by future research.

Noninvasive ventilation and high-flow oxygen therapy for severe community-acquired pneumonia.

Rationale: Acute hypercapnic respiratory failure has been shown to be associated with worse outcomes for various disease states, but less is known about patients with compensated hypercapnic respir...

Mortality and Healthcare Use of Patients with Compensated Hypercapnia.

Assessment of native cardiac output during extracorporeal circulation is challenging. We assessed a modified Fick principle under conditions such as deadspace and shunt in 13 anesthetized swine undergoing centrally canulated veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO, 308 measurement periods) therapy. We assumed that the ratio of carbon dioxide elimination (V̇CO2) or oxygen uptake (V̇O2) between the membrane and native lung corresponds to the ratio of respective blood flows. Unequal ventilation/perfusion (V̇/Q̇) ratios were corrected towards unity. Pulmonary blood flow was calculated and compared to an ultrasonic flow probe on the pulmonary artery with a bias of 99 mL/min (limits of agreement -542 to 741 mL/min) with blood content VO2 and no-shunt, no-deadspace conditions, which showed good trending ability (least significant change from 82 to 129 mL). Shunt conditions led to underestimation of native pulmonary blood flow (bias -395, limits of agreement -1290 to 500 mL/min). Bias and trending further depended on the gas (O2, CO2), and measurement approach (blood content vs. gas phase). Measurements in the gas phase increased the bias (253 [LoA -1357 to 1863 mL/min] for expired V̇O2 bias 482 [LoA -760 to 1724 mL/min] for expired V̇CO2) and could be improved by correction of V̇/Q̇ inequalities. Our results show that common assumptions of the Fick principle in two competing circulations give results with adequate accuracy and may offer a clinically applicable tool. Precision depends on specific conditions. This highlights the complexity of gas exchange in membrane lungs and may further deepen the understanding of V-A ECMO.

Integral assessment of gas exchange during veno-arterial ECMO: accuracy and precision of a modified Fick principle in a porcine model

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) has an established evidence base in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and has seen exponential growth in its use over the past decades. However, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the approach to weaning, with variation of practice and outcomes between centres. Preconditions for weaning, management of patients' sedation and mechanical ventilation during this phase, criteria defining success or failure, and the optimal duration of a trial prior to decannulation are all debated subjects. Moreover, there is no prospective evidence demonstrating the superiority of weaning the sweep gas flow (SGF), the extracorporeal blood flow (ECBF) or the fraction of oxygen of the SGF (FdO2), thereby a broad inter-centre variability exists in this regard. Accordingly, the aim of this review is to discuss the required physiological basis to interpret different weaning approaches: first, we will outline the physiological changes in blood gases which should be expected from manipulations of ECBF, SGF and FdO2. Subsequently, we will describe the resulting adaptation of patients' control of breathing, with special reference to the effects of weaning on respiratory effort. Finally, we will discuss pertinent elements of the monitoring and mechanical ventilation of passive and spontaneously breathing patients during a weaning trial. Indeed, to avoid lung injury, invasive monitoring is often required in patients making spontaneous effort, as pressures measured at the airway may not reflect the degree of lung strain. In the absence of evidence, our approach to weaning is driven largely by an understanding of physiology. 

/pdf/physiological-adaptations-during-weaning-from-veno-venous-1ea1xp02.pdf

Physiological adaptations during weaning from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

The extent of ventilator‐induced lung injury may be related to the intensity of mechanical ventilation––expressed as mechanical power. In the present study, we investigated whether there is a safe threshold, below which lung damage is absent. Three groups of six healthy pigs (29.5 ± 2.5 kg) were ventilated prone for 48 h at mechanical power of 3, 7, or 12 J/min. Strain never exceeded 1.0. PEEP was set at 4 cmH2O. Lung volumes were measured every 12 h; respiratory, hemodynamics, and gas exchange variables every 6. End‐experiment histological findings were compared with a control group of eight pigs which did not undergo mechanical ventilation. Functional residual capacity decreased by 10.4% ± 10.6% and 8.1% ± 12.1% in the 7 J and 12 J groups (p = 0.017, p < 0.001) but not in the 3 J group (+1.7% ± 17.7%, p = 0.941). In 3 J group, lung elastance, PaO2 and PaCO2 were worse compared to 7 J and 12 J groups (all p < 0.001), due to lower ventilation‐perfusion ratio (0.54 ± 0.13, 1.00 ± 0.25, 1.78 ± 0.36 respectively, p < 0.001). The lung weight was lower (p < 0.001) in the controls (6.56 ± 0.90 g/kg) compared to 3, 7, and 12 J groups (12.9 ± 3.0, 16.5 ± 2.9, and 15.0 ± 4.1 g/kg, respectively). The wet‐to‐dry ratio was 5.38 ± 0.26 in controls, 5.73 ± 0.52 in 3 J, 5.99 ± 0.38 in 7 J, and 6.13 ± 0.59 in 12 J group (p = 0.03). Vascular congestion was more extensive in the 7 J and 12 J compared to 3 J and control groups. Mechanical ventilation (with anesthesia/paralysis) increase lung weight, and worsen lung histology, regardless of the mechanical power. Ventilating at 3 J/min led to better anatomical variables than at 7 and 12 J/min but worsened the physiological values.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.14814/phy2.15225

Mechanical power thresholds during mechanical ventilation: An experimental study

Rationale: Understanding the physiology of CO2 stores mobilization is a prerequisite for intermittent extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) in patients with chronic hypercapnia.Objectives: To describ...

Mobilizing Carbon Dioxide Stores. An Experimental Study.

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Alessandro Gatta

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Mechanical power thresholds during mechanical ventilation: An experimental study

Mobilizing Carbon Dioxide Stores. An Experimental Study.