https://portal.edu.chula.ac.th/pub/jrm/index.php/jrm/article/download/408/pdf_349

Empowerment Evaluation Principles in Practice

This article examines the evaluation process and approach undertaken for a recent 3-year Integrated Justice Practice project. Three key approaches underpinned the evaluation framework or program lo...

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1035719X19832688

Evaluating projects in multifaceted and marginalised communities: The need for mixed approaches:

The strong presence of Indigenous Australians at the 2014 Australasian Evaluation Society (AES) conference highlights expansion in the ways Indigenous people are working as evaluation practitioners and collaborating in evaluation. This may reflect changing practice, moving from the involvement of Indigenous Australians solely as the users of programs to their more diverse and active engagement in the conduct of evaluations. However, it is not clear how far this shift extends to Indigenous‐led shaping of evaluation questions or framing the interpretation of findings. In this chapter, Indigenous Australian coauthors who are practicing evaluators explore dimensions of Indigenous participation. Themes covering knowledge and engagement processes and principles emerged from the conference, demonstrating how “ways of knowing and doing” make Indigenous evaluation much more than about method. The concept of an “adaptive shared space” is presented as a venue for growing respectful collaboration. Developing deliberative learning among Indigenous and non‐indigenous people, commissioners, and practitioners, offers a way to bring deeper meaning to evaluation practice.

The Strength of Indigenous Australian Evaluators and Indigenous Evaluation: A Snapshot of “Ways of Knowing and Doing” Reflecting on the 2014 Darwin Conference of the Australasian Evaluation Society

Indigenous Perspectives in Program Evaluation: A scoping literature review exploring wise practices for program evaluation with Indigenous communities in northern Manitoba

La tensión entre eficiencia y democracia —y participación ciudadana— es uno de los grandes tópicos que tocan a la Administración pública, tanto como práctica social como disciplina académica. Las diferencias entre las perspectivas eficientistas y participativas generan diversas formas de comprender el funcionamiento de las instituciones públicas y su relación con la ciudadanía. Una de las principales divergencias se genera en relación a la rendición de cuentas. Este debate no se remite únicamente al tipo de información a utilizar sino también a qué criterios de evaluación considerar. En respuesta a las aproximaciones eficientistas que han dominado la implementación de sistemas de monitoreo y evaluación en las últimas décadas, la evaluación participativa, enfoque que se basa en supuestos constructivistas y de la teoría crítica, se ha levantado como una alternativa válida. Este artículo presenta una revisión de literatura sobre evaluaciones participativas en distintas regiones y sectores de intervención administrativa, con el fin de responder dos preguntas: ¿Qué podemos aprender de este enfoque y la forma en que ha sido utilizado? ¿Es posible incorporar la evaluación participativa de forma más amplia en la Administración del Estado?

Participación ciudadana en la administración del estado ¿es la evaluación participativa una alternativa viable?

Participatory evaluation can be embedded in programs to support good governance and facilitate informed decision making in Aboriginal communities in remote and urban contexts. An Aboriginal Elder f...

Participatory evaluation is the sea eagle looking “long way wide eyed”:

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Alberta Puruntatameri

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Participatory evaluation is the sea eagle looking “long way wide eyed”: