Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinical arrhythmia disorder. It can easily lead to complications such as thromboembolism, palpitations, dizziness, angina, heart failure, and stroke. The disability and mortality rates associated with AF are extremely high, significantly affecting the quality of life and work of patients. With the deepening of research into the brain-heart connection, the link between AF and stroke has become increasingly evident. AF is now categorized as either Known Atrial Fibrillation (KAF) or Atrial Fibrillation Detected After Stroke (AFDAS), with stroke as the baseline. This article, through a literature review, briefly summarizes the current pathogenesis of KAF and AFDAS, as well as the status of their clinical pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. It has been found that the existing treatments for KAF and AFDAS have limited efficacy and are often associated with significant adverse reactions and a risk of recurrence. Moreover, most drugs and treatment methods tend to focus on a single mechanism pathway. For example, drugs targeting ion channels primarily modulate ion channels and have relatively limited impact on other pathways. This limitation underscores the need to break away from the “one disease, one target, one drug/measurement” dogma for the development of innovative treatments, promoting both drug and non-drug therapies and significantly improving the quality of clinical treatment. With the increasing refinement of the overall mechanisms of KAF and AFDAS, a deeper exploration of physiological pathology, and comprehensive research on the brain-heart relationship, it is imperative to shift from long-term symptom management to more precise and optimized treatment methods that are effective for almost all patients. We anticipate that drugs or non-drug therapies targeting the central nervous system and upstream pathways can guide the simultaneous treatment of multiple downstream pathways in AF, thereby becoming a new breakthrough in AF treatment research.

Research on atrial fibrillation mechanisms and prediction of therapeutic prospects: focus on the autonomic nervous system upstream pathways

It is currently unclear if active left ventricular (LV) unloading should be used as a primary treatment strategy or as a bailout in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).This study sought to evaluate the association between timing of active LV unloading and implantation of VA-ECMO with outcomes of patients with CS.Data from 421 patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO and active LV unloading at 18 tertiary care centers in 4 countries were analyzed. Patients were stratified by timing of device implantation in early vs delayed active LV unloading (defined by implantation before up to 2 hours after VA-ECMO). Adjusted Cox and logistic regression models were fitted to evaluate the association between early active LV unloading and 30-day mortality as well as successful weaning from ventilation.Overall, 310 (73.6%) patients with CS were treated with early active LV unloading. Early active LV unloading was associated with a lower 30-day mortality risk (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46-0.88) and a higher likelihood of successful weaning from ventilation (OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.19-3.93) but not with more complications. Importantly, the relative mortality risk increased and the likelihood of successful weaning from ventilation decreased almost proportionally with the time interval between VA-ECMO implantation and (delayed) initiation of active LV unloading.This exploratory study lends support to the use of early active LV unloading in CS patients on VA-ECMO, although the findings need to be validated in a randomized controlled trial. 

Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: At the Nexus of the Heart, Brain, and Mind.

Abstract Stroke can lead to cardiac complications such as arrhythmia, myocardial injury, and cardiac dysfunction, collectively termed stroke–heart syndrome (SHS). These cardiac alterations typically peak within 72 h of stroke onset and can have long-term effects on cardiac function. Post-stroke cardiac complications seriously affect prognosis and are the second most frequent cause of death in patients with stroke. Although traditional vascular risk factors contribute to SHS, other potential mechanisms indirectly induced by stroke have also been recognized. Accumulating clinical and experimental evidence has emphasized the role of central autonomic network disorders and inflammation as key pathophysiological mechanisms of SHS. Therefore, an assessment of post-stroke cardiac dysautonomia is necessary. Currently, the development of treatment strategies for SHS is a vital but challenging task. Identifying potential key mediators and signaling pathways of SHS is essential for developing therapeutic targets. Therapies targeting pathophysiological mechanisms may be promising. Remote ischemic conditioning exerts protective effects through humoral, nerve, and immune-inflammatory regulatory mechanisms, potentially preventing the development of SHS. In the future, well-designed trials are required to verify its clinical efficacy. This comprehensive review provides valuable insights for future research. 

pdf/stroke-heart-syndrome-current-progress-and-future-outlook-1qf50d8ct6.pdf

Stroke–heart syndrome: current progress and future outlook

The insular cortex, autonomic asymmetry and cardiovascular control: looking at the right side of stroke

There has been a gradual increase in the occurrence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ischemic diseases, particularly as comorbidities. Yet, the mechanisms underlying these diseases remain unclear. Ferroptosis has emerged as a potential contributor to cardio-cerebral ischemic processes. Therefore, this study investigated the shared biological mechanisms between the two processes, as well as the role of ferroptosis genes in cardio-cerebral ischemic damage, by constructing co-expression modules for myocardial ischemia (MI) and ischemic stroke (IS) and a network of protein-protein interactions, mRNA-miRNA, mRNA-transcription factors (TFs), mRNA-RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), and mRNA-drug interactions.The study identified seven key genes, specifically ACSL1, TLR4, ADIPOR1, G0S2, PDK4, HP, PTGS2, and subjected them to functional enrichment analysis during ischemia. The predicted miRNAs were found to interact with 35 hub genes, and interactions were observed between 11 hub genes and 30 TF transcription factors. Additionally, 10 RBPs corresponding to 16 hub genes and 163 molecular compounds corresponding to 30 hub genes were identified. This study also clarified the levels of immune infiltration between MI and IS and different subtypes. Finally, we identified four hub genes, including TLR4, by using a diagnostic model constructed by Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis; ADIPOR1, G0S2, and HP were shown to have diagnostic value for the co-pathogenesis of MI and cerebral ischemia by both validation test data and RT-qPCR assay.To the best our knowledge, this study is the first to utilize multiple algorithms to comprehensively analyze the biological processes of MI and IS from various perspectives. The four hub genes, TLR4, ADIPOR1, G0S2, and HP, have proven valuable in offering insights for the investigation of shared injury pathways in cardio-cerebral injuries. Therefore, these genes may serve as diagnostic markers for cardio-cerebral ischemic diseases. 

Integrative analyses and validation of ferroptosis-related genes and mechanisms associated with cerebrovascular and cardiovascular ischemic diseases

Background Neurogenic cardiac impairment can occur after acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but the mapping of the neuroanatomic correlation of stroke-related myocardial injury remains uncertain. This study aims to identify the association between cardiac outcomes and middle cerebral artery (MCA) ischemic stroke, with or without insular cortex involvement, as well as the impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after AIS on recurrent stroke. Methods Serial measurements of high sensitivity troponin T (TnT), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiogram, and cardiac monitoring were performed on 415 patients with imaging confirmed MCA stroke, with or without insular involvement. Patients with renal failure, recent cardiovascular events, or congestive heart failure were excluded. Results One hundred fifteen patients (28%) had left MCA infarcts with insular involvement, 122 (29%) had right MCA infarcts involving insular cortex, and 178 (43%) had no insular involvement. Patients with left MCA stroke with insular involvement tended to exhibit higher BNP and TnI, and transient cardiac dysfunction, which mimicked Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in 10 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 20-40%. Incidence of new-onset AF was higher in right MCA stroke involving insula (39%) than left MCA involving insula (4%). Nine out of fifty-three patients with new-onset AF were not on anticoagulant therapy due to various reasons; none of them experienced recurrent AF or stroke during up to a 3-year follow-up period. Statistically significant correlations between BNP or TnT elevation and left insular infarcts, as well as the incidence of AF and right insular infarcts, were revealed using linear regression analysis. Conclusions The present study demonstrated that acute left MCA stroke with insular involvement could cause transient cardiac dysfunction and elevated cardiac enzymes without persistent negative outcomes in the setting of health baseline cardiac condition. The incidence of new-onset AF was significantly higher in patients with right MCA stroke involving the insula. There was no increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke in nine patients with newly developed AF who were not on anticoagulant therapy, which indicated a need for further research on presumed neurogenic AF and its management. 

Neurogenic cardiac outcome in patients after acute ischemic stroke: The brain and heart connection.

Neurogenic Cardiac Outcome in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Brain-Heart Connection (S35.005)

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

Abdullah Umar

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

Neurogenic cardiac outcome in patients after acute ischemic stroke: The brain and heart connection.

Neurogenic Cardiac Outcome in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Brain-Heart Connection (S35.005)