A.M. Bauer
Technische Universität München
19 Papers
25 Citations
A.M. Bauer is an academic researcher from Technische Universität München. The author has contributed to research in topics: Isogeometric analysis & Computer science. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 17 publications.
Chat about Author
Papers
Nonlinear isogeometric spatial Bernoulli Beam
TL;DR: In this paper, a nonlinear element formulation of a geometrically nonlinear spatial curved beam assuming Bernoulli theory including torsion without warping is proposed, which is derived directly from the 3D-continuum by means of nonlinear kinematics.
124
Realization of CAD-integrated shell simulation based on isogeometric B-Rep analysis
T. Teschemacher,A.M. Bauer,T. Oberbichler,Micheal Breitenberger,Riccardo Rossi,Roland Wüchner,Kai-Uwe Bletzinger +6 more
TL;DR: An entire design-through-analysis workflow solution for isogeometric B-Rep analysis (IBRA), including both the interface to existing CADs and the analysis procedure, is presented and possible approaches are elaborated for the full scope of structural analysis solvers ranging from low to highisogeometric simulation fidelity.
Embedded structural entities in NURBS-based isogeometric analysis
TL;DR: An adapted formulation of the recently developed nonlinear isogeometric spatial Bernoulli Beam by the authors is presented and the accuracy of the proposed element formulation is verified by several benchmark examples and the potential for future applications is briefly revealed.
40
Weak coupling of nonlinear isogeometric spatial Bernoulli beams
TL;DR: A coupling scheme for isogeometric elements, which is valid for large rotations and displacements, and incorporated by an additional term in the Principle of Virtual Work which is here computed using a penalty approach.
21
Exploring Software Approaches for the Design and Simulation of Bending Active Systems
A.M. Bauer,P. Längst,R. La Magna,Julian Lienhard,Daniel Piker,Gregory Quinn,Christoph Gengnagel,Kai-Uwe Bletzinger +7 more
- 01 Jan 2018
TL;DR: This paper presents a quantitative and qualitative benchmark comparison between three distinct software environments, namely SOFiSTiK, Kangaroo and Kiwi3d, framed specifically within the context of designing and simulating bending-active structures.
13