Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are generally sedated for prolonged periods. Over-sedation and under-sedation both have negative effects on patient safety and resource use. We conducted a systematic review of the literature in order to establish the incidence of sub-optimal sedation (both over- and under-sedation) in ICUs.

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186%2Fcc8212.pdf

The incidence of sub-optimal sedation in the ICU: a systematic review.

Background: critically ill patients require life-support technologies such as mechanical ventilation (breathing machines) and can experience pain, anxiety, and sleep deprivation related to their illness. Good pain control and adequate sedation are important but too much sedative drug can increase the time on breathing machines and the chance of harmful effects such as pneumonia.
Medications that are available have many properties that make them difficult to use in critically ill patients. Without careful adjustments these properties can lead to a build up of drug in the body. These medications are given as continuous infusions, so that blood levels remain stable, and dose changes are left to clinician judgement. In order to avoid drug build up, several methods can be used to adjust doses. Some studies claim that an interruption, or stopping the drug for a period of time each day, will allow the body to clear the drugs and lead to patients being more awake and ready for earlier liberation from the breathing machine.
Search date: current to February 2014.
Study characteristics: we included nine studies involving 1282 critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Studies compared daily sedation interruption to strategies that did not include an interruption. Studies were conducted worldwide and involved both medical and surgical critically ill patients.
Key results: we did not find strong evidence that daily sedation interruption reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital, death, or the amount of drug used. The effect on adverse events such as accidental removal of the breathing tube or invasive devices, or the rate of delirium was uncertain. However, tracheostomy was performed less often in those who were managed with daily sedation interruption. Sedation practices are known to vary worldwide, and as such an analysis of studies conducted in North America showed a reduction in time on the breathing machine for those who were managed with daily sedation interruption compared to those who were not.
Quality of the evidence: we advise caution should be applied when interpreting and applying our study findings. The results are based upon a small number of studies that were heterogeneous or not uniform in terms of methods, patients studied, and clinical management and our overall results only marginally crossed the no-effect line.

/pdf/daily-sedation-interruption-versus-no-daily-sedation-2d7rwcbbyv.pdf

Daily sedation interruption versus no daily sedation interruption for critically ill adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation

https://www.criticalcare.theclinics.com/article/S0749-0704(09)00035-9/pdf

Current Sedation Practices: Lessons Learned from International Surveys

Our aim was to describe analgo-sedation and antipsychotic and neuromuscular blocking drug (NMBD) use in critically ill patients, management strategies, and variables associated with these practice patterns This prospective observational study in 51 intensive care units (ICUs) included all patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) over a two-week period during 2008-2009 We included 712 patients representing 3,620 patient-days Median MV duration was 30 days (interquartile range 2-6) During MV, 92% of patients received analgo-sedation, 32% an adjunct agent (eg, acetaminophen), 18% NMBDs, and 10% antipsychotics Opioids were used more frequently than benzodiazepines or propofol (848% vs 622% vs 101% patients, respectively, P < 00001) Independent predictors of opioid and benzodiazepine use were a longer MV duration, assessment scales, physical restraints, and university-affiliated hospital Although more than 50% of ICUs reported that assessment tools, protocols, and daily sedation interruption (DSI) were available for use, application was modest: sedation scale 530%, pain scale 191%, delirium scale 52%, protocol 250%, DSI 421% Accidental device removal occurred in 46% of patients, with 758% of events during DSI Daily sedation interruption was associated with protocol use, physical restraints, university-affiliated hospital, and short-duration MV Variables associated with protocol use included assessment scales, longer MV duration, lack of physical restraints, and admission to a community hospital Nearly all MV patients received analgo-sedation Opioids were used more often than sedatives despite infrequent use of pain scales Few patients received antipsychotic therapy, but physical restraint was common Protocol use was poor compared to DSI Duration of MV predicted the use of either

Analgesic, sedative, antipsychotic, and neuromuscular blocker use in Canadian intensive care units: a prospective, multicentre, observational study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate sedation practice in UK intensive care units (ICUs), particularly the implementation of daily sedation holding, written sedation guidelines, sedation scoring tools and choice of agents. A national postal survey was conducted in all UK ICUs. A total of 192 responses out of 302 addressed units were received (63.5%). Of the responding ICUs, 88% used a sedation scoring tool, most frequently the Ramsey Sedation Scale score (66.4%). The majority of units have a written sedation guideline (80%), and 78% state that daily sedation holding is practiced. A wide variety of sedating agents is used, with the choice of agent largely determined by the duration of action rather than cost. The most frequently used agents were propofol and alfentanil for short-term sedation; propofol, midazolam and morphine for longer sedation; and propofol for weaning purposes. Most UK ICUs use a sedation guideline and sedation scoring tool. The concept of sedation holding has been implemented in the majority of units, and most ICUs have a written sedation guideline.

/pdf/sedation-practice-in-the-intensive-care-unit-a-uk-national-1ibgwpaqls.pdf

Sedation practice in the intensive care unit: a UK national survey

SIAARTI recommendations for analgo-sedation in intensive care unit.

SIAARTI recommendations for analogo-sedation in intensive care unit

Evaluation of the anxiety status in relation to surgical intervention

Thirty patients undergoing extra-thyroid surgery were divided into two groups (A and B) according to the extent of surgical stress (Group A: major surgery; Group B; minor surgery). Thyroid hormone levels were measured before the operation and up to the 3rd postoperative day in Group B and up to the 7th postoperative day in Group A. A low T3 syndrome was observed in all 30 patients examined of the first postoperative day (reduction of T3 and increase in rT3 without alterations of total thyroxin or signs of hypothyroidism) with normalisation of thyroid values by 3rd postoperative in Group B and later in Group A. The persistence of the syndrome in the latter group was due to the extent of surgical stress, the duration of anesthesia, the presence of stress factors such as staying in intensive therapy, painful symptoms and a negative energy balance during the first days following operation. This syndrome is indicative of a physiological adaptation process to reduce O2 consumption, basal metabolism and in particular protein catabolism.

[Low T3 syndrome (3,3',5-triiodothyronine) in relation to the extent of surgical trauma].

Handle everyday research tasks with reliable, citation-backed results

Your personal Research Agent to handle research tasks with citation-backed results

Popular Tasks used by Researchers

How can I help with your research?

Meet SciSpace

Get more enhanced response by uploading the PDFs you want me to reference.

No relevant PDFs in your library

SciSpace is the AI research assistant for academics. Run systematic literature reviews on 280M+ papers, and write papers with cited sources. Trusted by 1M+ students, PhDs & researchers.

SciSpace | AI for Research

Analyze PDFs

Code & Manuscripts

Funding & Grants

Literature & Patents

Medical & Clinical Data

Systematic Review

Visualize & Present

Web & Data

Build a Google Scholar-like website for your research.

Build a website

Create charts and images for your research

Create a Chart

Write a paper for submission to a journal

Draft a manuscript

Patent Search

Design eye-catching scientific posters in minutes.

Scientific Poster Generation

Systematic Literature Review

One task is running at the moment. Your messages will be shown right after.

Drag and drop or click here to browse

Loved by <highlight>1 million+</highlight> researchers

Extract a list of specific topics and their sources from unstructured text

Topics

Compare and analyze relevant papers that matches with your search

Papers

Get insights from PDFs and bookmarked papers from your library

My library

Recent searches

Try searching for:

Catch AI-generated content in scholarly and non-scholarly content

{ai} Detector

Ai Writer

Get PDF Summaries, highlighted text explanations 

Chat with PDF

Effortlessly create in-text citations and bibliographies in APA and 2,500 other formats

Citation generator

Get explanations, summaries, and answers on academic papers

Ease up your research workflow with {scispace}'s cohort of exciting AI tools

Elevate your academic writing skills and convey your ideas the way you want

Paraphraser

Explore our range of reading and writing tools

Your file is being prepared and should be ready in a few minutes. If it's a large file, it might take a bit longer. You can close this window, and we'll email you the file when it's done.

You have reached a maximum limit of <strong>{limit}</strong> columns in the table. Remove at least <strong>1</strong> column to add or create another one.

A Guberti

Author Tools

Chat about Author

Papers

SIAARTI recommendations for analgo-sedation in intensive care unit.

SIAARTI recommendations for analogo-sedation in intensive care unit

Evaluation of the anxiety status in relation to surgical intervention

[Low T3 syndrome (3,3',5-triiodothyronine) in relation to the extent of surgical trauma].